ArticleScientific reports2024
Developing an AI-based application for caries index detection on intraoral photographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Its Trust and Translation.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of artificial intelligence-driven smartphone imaging for dental caries detection: A systematic review.The Japanese dental science review · 2026Review
- Classification of occlusal caries severity using spectrophotometric CIELAB measurements and machine learning algorithms.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Mobile Imaging-Based Machine Learning for Dental Caries, Sealants, and Fluorosis: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Transforming Dental Care Through Empathetic and Clear Communication: A Comprehensive Review and Implementation Framework.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for dental caries diagnosis: translating algorithms to clinical practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Feasibility of multi-class dental caries detection using deep learning-based smartphone images: a pilot prospective study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Annotated intraoral image dataset for dental caries detection.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A visualization system for intelligent diagnosis and statistical analysis of oral diseases based on panoramic radiography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel deep learning-based model for automated tooth detection and numbering in mixed and permanent dentition in occlusal photographs.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for occlusion classification in intraoral photographs.PeerJ · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based smartphone application designed for decay detection on intraoral photographs, comparing its performance to that of junior dentists. Conducted at The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan, this study utilized a dataset comprising 7,465 intraoral images, including both primary and secondary dentitions. These images were meticulously annotated by two experienced dentists and further verified by senior dentists. A YOLOv5s model was trained on this dataset and integrated into a smartphone application, while a Detection Transformer was also fine-tuned for comparative purposes. Explainable AI techniques were employed to assess the AI's decision-making processes. A sample of 70 photographs was used to directly compare the application's performance with that of junior dentists. Results showed that the YOLOv5s-based smartphone application achieved a precision of 90.7%, sensitivity of 85.6%, and an F1 score of 88.0% in detecting dental decay. In contrast, junior dentists achieved 83.3% precision, 64.1% sensitivity, and an F1 score of 72.4%. The study concludes that the YOLOv5s algorithm effectively detects dental decay on intraoral photographs and performs comparably to junior dentists. This application holds potential for aiding in the evaluation of the caries index within populations, thus contributing to efforts aimed at reducing the disease burden at the community level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.