ArticleScientific reports2024
Exploration on the construction of a bladder cancer prognostic model based on disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs and its clinical significance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disulfidptosis is a novel programmed cell death mode that has been reported to play a role in oncogenesis. Increasing evidences suggest that the long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play crucial roles in the initiation and progression of bladder cancer (BLCA). However, the role and prognostic value of disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs in BLCA remain unknown.The aim of this study was to construct and validate a disulfidptosis-related lncRNA risk model for predicting the prognosis of BLCA patients. A risk model consisting of 5 disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs was developed to predict the prognosis of BLCA patients. The overall survival (OS) of BLCA patients in the high-risk group was significantly shorter than that in the low-risk group (P < 0.05). The effectiveness of this model was validated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and this model proved superior in prognostic accuracy compared with other clinical features. Furthermore, the tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score in the high-risk group was significantly higher than that in the low-risk group, suggesting that the high-risk group had a less favorable response to immunotherapy. Simultaneously, patients in the low-risk group exhibited significantly higher sensitivity to CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody therapy compared to those in the high-risk group, suggesting potential benefits of immunotherapy for patients in the low-risk group. The combination of high risk and low tumor mutational burden (TMB) could further shortened the OS of BLCA patients. Lastly, the drug sensitivity analysis revealed that the BLCA cells in the high-risk group showed an increased sensitivity to cisplatin, sunitinib, cetuximab, axitinib, docetaxel, saracatinib, vinblastine and pazopanib compared with those in the low-risk group. According to the Quantitative real time PCR results, we found that five lncRNAs of the risk model were more highly expressed in BCa cell lines than human immortalized uroepithelial cell line. The disulfidptosis-related lncRNA risk model has a valuable effect in assessing the prognosis of BLCA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.