Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500980›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Scalable deep learning artificial intelligence histopathology slide analysis and validation.

Colin Greeley, Lawrence Holder, Eric E Nilsson, Michael K Skinner

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stability of epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult-onset disease and parturition abnormalities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Neural Networks for Bioimage Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Colin GreeleySchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-2752, USA.
Lawrence HolderSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-2752, USA. holder@wsu.edu.
Eric E NilssonCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Michael K SkinnerCenter for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. skinner@wsu.edu.

Funding

EPIGENETIC TRANSGENERATIONAL ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR ACTIONSR01ES012974 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SKINNER, MICHAEL K · 2005 to 2018
$4.6M
John Templeton Foundation 50183NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning involves an artificial intelligence (AI) approach and has been shown to provide superior performance for automating image recognition tasks, as well as exceeding human capabilities in both time and accuracy. Histopathology diagnostics is one of the more popular challenges at the intersection of artificial intelligence, computer vision, and medicine. Developing methods to automatically detect and identify pathologies in digitized histology slides imposes unique challenges due to the large size of these images and the complexity of the features present in biological tissue. Most methods that are capable of human-level recognition in histopathology are tuned to a specific problem since the computational complexity exceeds that of traditional image classification problems. In the current study, a deep learning approach is developed and presented that can be trained to locate and accurately classify different types of pathologies in gigapixel digitized histology slides along with completing the binary disease classification for the entire image. The approach uses a novel pyramid tiling approach to take advantage of spatial awareness around the area to be classified, while maintaining efficiency and scalability for gigapixel images. The approach is trained and validated on a wide variety of tissue types (i.e., testis, ovary, prostate, kidney) and pathologies taken from an epigenetically altered histology study at Washington State University. The newly developed procedure was optimized and validated along with comparison and validation on public histology datasets. The current developed procedure was found to be optimal and more reproducible when compared to manual procedures, and optimal to previous protocols that used fragmented tissue or slide analysis. Observations demonstrate that the deep learning histopathology analysis is significantly more efficient and accurate than standard manual histopathology analysis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleAIArtificial IntelligenceDeep learningDigitatedGigapixelHistologyHistopathologyPathologySlides

Identifiers

PMID39500980
PMCPMC11538358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.