ArticleScientific reports2024
Profiling the bacterial microbiome diversity and assessing the potential to detect antimicrobial resistance bacteria in wastewater in Kimberley, South Africa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transkingdom Interactions Between Viruses and Bacteria: Implications for Wastewater Treatment Efficiency.Food and environmental virology · 2026Review
- Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance Across One Health Interfaces in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microbial stewardship for sustainable dye remediation with a special emphasis on consortia engineering, computational techniques, and microbial bioprospecting.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are hotspots for pathogens, and can facilitate horizontal gene transfer, potentially releasing harmful genetic material and antimicrobial resistance genes into the environment. Little information exists on the composition and behavior of microbes in WWTPs, especially in developing countries. This study used environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques to examine the microbiome load of wastewater from WWTPs. The DNA was isolated from wastewater samples collected from the treatment trains of three WWTPs in Kimberley, South Africa, and the microbial diversity and composition was compared through 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. The microbes detected were of the Kingdom Bacteria, and of these, 48.27% were successfully identified to genus level. The majority of reads from the combined bacterial data fall within the class Gammaproteobacteria, which is known to adversely impact ecological and human health. Arcobacteraceae constituted 19% of the bacterial reads, which is expected as this family is widespread in aquatic environments. Interestingly, the most abundant bacterial group was Bacteroides, which contain a variety of antibiotic-resistant members. Overall, various antibiotic-resistant taxa were detected in the wastewater, indicating a concerning level of antibiotic resistance within the bacterial community. Therefore, eDNA analysis can be a valuable tool in monitoring and assessing the bacterial microbiome in wastewater, thus providing important information for the optimization and improvement of wastewater treatment systems and mitigate public health risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.