ArticleScientific reports2024
Data normalization of plasma miRNA profiling from patients with COVID-19.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peripheral and Central miRNA Signatures in Alzheimer's Disease: Tissue-Specific Variability, Sex-Associated Differences, and Implications for Blood-Based Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- RNA biomarkers in spinal muscular atrophy: enhancing pathogenesis understanding and guiding precision medicine.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Plasma extracellular vesicle cargo microRNAs are associated with heart failure and cardiovascular death following acute coronary syndrome.Extracellular vesicle · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When using the reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) technique for quantitative assessment of microRNA (miRNA) expression, normalizing data using a stable endogenous gene is essential; however, no universally adequate reference gene exists. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine, via the RNA-Seq technique, the most adequate endogenous normalizer for the expression assessment of plasma miRNAs in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Two massive sequencing procedures were performed (a) to identify differentially expressed miRNAs between patients with COVID-19 and healthy volunteers (n = 12), and (b) to identify differentially expressed miRNAs between patients with severe COVID-19 and those with mild COVID-19 (n = 8). The endogenous normalizer candidates were selected according to the following criteria: (1) the miRNA must have a fold regulation = 1; (2) the miRNA must have a p-value > 0.990; and (3) the miRNAs that were discovered the longest ago should be selected. Four miRNAs (hsa-miR-34a-3p, hsa-miR-194-3p, hsa-miR-17-3p, and hsa-miR-205-3p) met all criteria and were selected for validation by RT-qPCR in a cohort of 125 patients. Of these, only hsa-miR-205-3p was eligible endogenous normalizers in the context of COVID-19 because their expression was stable between the compared groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.