Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500827›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025

Highly resistant Salmonella Heidelberg circulating in broiler farms in southern Brazil.

Bianca Fagundes Saggin, Karen Apellanis Borges, Thales Quedi Furian, Gustavo da Rosa Fünkler, Rafael Mollerke, Manuela Machado Cenci, Roberta de Castro Bönmann, Tiele Maria Feijó de Fraga, Daniela Tonini da Rocha, Hamilton Luiz de Souza Moraes and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Behavior of surface contamination by Salmonella spp. on broiler carcasses during slaughter stages.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. A spotlight on multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bianca Fagundes SagginCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Karen Apellanis BorgesCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil. karen.borges@ufrgs.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6649-5833
Thales Quedi FurianCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Gustavo da Rosa FünklerCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Rafael MollerkeCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Manuela Machado CenciCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Roberta de Castro BönmannCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Tiele Maria Feijó de FragaCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Daniela Tonini da RochaCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Hamilton Luiz de Souza MoraesCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.
Vladimir Pinheiro do NascimentoCentro de Diagnóstico e Pesquisa em Patologia Aviária (CDPA), Departamento de Medicina Animal, Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Avenida Bento Gonçalves 9090, Porto Alegre, 91540-00, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella Heidelberg, a serotype commonly found in Southern Brazil, is characterized by its high resistance and persistence in the poultry production. This study aimed to characterize the antimicrobial resistance of S. Heidelberg strains. In total, 100 strains isolated from poultry between 2020 and 2022 were evaluated. Phenotypic analyses were performed to determine the susceptibility of 16 antimicrobial agents and detect extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains. Molecular analyses were performed to detect 11 antimicrobial resistance genes (using polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) and integron class 1 genes (using real-time PCR). A total of 98% of isolates was classified as multidrug-resistant. All isolates were resistant to penicillin and lincomycin. High resistance rates (> 85%) were observed for tetracycline, doxycycline, cephalexin, amoxicillin, and ceftiofur. A significant increase (p < 0.05) in antimicrobial resistance is observed for amoxicillin, cephalexin, and ceftiofur between 2020 and 2022. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in antimicrobial resistance with respect to the region of isolation, season, or company. In total, 25% of isolates were ESBL producers. Integron class 1 gene was detected in only one strain, whereas sul2 was detected in 99%, tet(A) in 66%, bla

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsChickensDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialPoultry DiseasesSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnimalsbeta-LactamasesBrazilFarmsIntegronsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamasesantimicrobial resistance genesclass 1 integronESBLmultidrug resistance

Identifiers

PMID39500827
PMCPMC11885699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.