ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Evaluation of biofilm formation and antimicrobial susceptibility (drug resistance) of Candida albicans isolates.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Antibiofilm activity of terbinafine, itraconazole and their combination against Sporothrix brasiliensis yeast-like form's biofilms.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Advancing the Understanding of the Mo-CBPProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Hypertonic thermal solutions as a putative strategy for respiratory biofilm disruption.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Lichen-Associated Endophytes from Helan Mountains: Insight into Microbial Diversity and Application.Polish journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Retinoids as Alternative Antifungal Agents AgainstMicroorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Candida albicans comprises over 80% of isolates from all forms of human candidiasis. Biofilm formation enhances their capacity to withstand therapeutic treatments. In addition to providing protection, biofilm formation by C. albicans enhances its pathogenicity. Understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying biofilm formation is crucial to advance our understanding and treatment of invasive Candida infections. An initial screening of 57 Candida spp. isolates using CHROMagar Candida (CHROMagar) media revealed that 46 were C. albicans. Of these, 12 isolates (33.3%) had the capacity to form biofilms. These 12 isolates were subjected to multiple biochemical and physiological tests, as well as 18 S rRNA sequencing, to confirm the presence of C. albicans. Upon analysis of their sensitivity to conventional antifungal agents, the isolates showed varying resistance to terbinafine (91.6%), voriconazole (50%), and fluconazole (42%). Among these, only CD50 showed resistance to all antifungal agents. Isolate CD50 also showed the presence of major biofilm-specific genes such as ALS3, EFG1, and BCR1, as confirmed by PCR. Exposure of CD50 to gentamicin-miconazole, a commonly prescribed drug combination to treat skin infections, resulted in elevated levels of gene expression, with ALS3 showing the highest fold increase. These observations highlight the necessity of understanding the proteins involved in biofilm formation and designing ligands with potential antifungal efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.