ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025
Ejaculate Adjustment in Response to Sperm Competition Risk in Humans.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Two classes of amine/glutamate multi-transmitter neurons innervate Drosophila internal male reproductive organs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous research suggests that human males, like males of many mammalian and avian species, adjust their ejaculate quality in accordance with sperm competition risk. Men who spend less time with their regular female partner since the couple's last copulation produce ejaculates with more sperm at the couple's next copulation (Baker & Bellis, 1993). We conducted a conceptual replication of this research to investigate whether sperm competition risk predicts ejaculate adjustment in human males using additional measures of sperm competition risk (e.g., perceptions of partner infidelity, presence of potential sexual rivals) and updated laser-optic semen analysis technology. We collected data from 34 heterosexual couples (age range 18-32 years) from a university population who completed self-report surveys on their relationship dynamics and provided six ejaculate samples (three copulatory and three masturbatory) across a 45-day period. Time spent together since the couple's last copulation was not significantly associated with ejaculate quality. However, sperm concentration for copulatory ejaculates was higher for men who perceived more potential sexual rivals. Discussion situates the current results within the literature on human sperm competition and suggests several directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39500803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.