Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500799›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Unbiased and reproducible liver MRI-PDFF estimation using a scan protocol-informed deep learning method.

Juan P Meneses, Ayyaz Qadir, Nirusha Surendran, Cristobal Arrieta, Cristian Tejos, Marcelo E Andia, Zhaolin Chen, Sergio Uribe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan P MenesesBiomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Ayyaz QadirDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nirusha SurendranDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Cristobal Arrietai-HEALTH Millennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
Cristian TejosBiomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Marcelo E Andiai-HEALTH Millennium Institute for Intelligent Healthcare Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
Zhaolin ChenMonash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sergio UribeBiomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. sergio.uribe@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-9710

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2020 - 21210665Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Fondecyt 1220922Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Fondecyt 1231535Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo ICN2021_004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate proton density fat fraction (PDFF) from chemical shift encoded (CSE) MR images using a deep learning (DL)-based method that is precise and robust to different MR scanners and acquisition echo times (TEs).

methodsVariable echo times neural network (VET-Net) is a two-stage framework that first estimates nonlinear variables of the CSE-MR signal model, to posteriorly estimate water/fat signal components using the least-squares method. VET-Net incorporates a vector with TEs as an auxiliary input, therefore enabling PDFF calculation with any TE setting. A single-site liver CSE-MRI dataset (188 subjects, 4146 axial slices) was considered, which was split into training (150 subjects), validation (18), and testing (20) subsets. Testing subjects were scanned using several protocols with different TEs, which we then used to measure the PDFF reproducibility coefficient (RDC) at two regions of interest (ROIs): the right posterior and left hepatic lobes. An open-source multi-site and multi-vendor fat-water phantom dataset was also used for PDFF bias assessment.

resultsVET-Net showed RDCs of 1.71% and 1.04% on the right posterior and left hepatic lobes, respectively, across different TEs, which was comparable to a reference graph cuts-based method (RDCs = 1.71% and 0.86%). VET-Net also showed a smaller PDFF bias (-0.55%) than graph cuts (0.93%) when tested on a multi-site phantom dataset. Reproducibility (1.94% and 1.59%) and bias (-2.04%) were negatively affected when the auxiliary TE input was not considered.

conclusionVET-Net provided unbiased and precise PDFF estimations using CSE-MR images from different hardware vendors and different TEs, outperforming conventional DL approaches. KEY POINTS: Question Reproducibility of liver PDFF DL-based approaches on different scan protocols or manufacturers is not validated. Findings VET-Net showed a PDFF bias of -0.55% on a multi-site phantom dataset, and RDCs of 1.71% and 1.04% at two liver ROIs. Clinical relevance VET-Net provides efficient, in terms of scan and processing times, and unbiased PDFF estimations across different MR scanners and scan protocols, and therefore it can be leveraged to expand the use of MRI-based liver fat quantification to assess hepatic steatosis.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueDeep LearningLiverMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersDeep learningLiverMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.