Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500788›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025

Breast Cancer Survivors' Perceptions of Mastectomy Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis of Medical Tattooing Impact on Aesthetics.

Miranda Proctor, Jeffrey E Cassisi, Robert D Dvorak, Veronica Decker, Stacie Becker

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miranda ProctorDepartment of Psychology, College of Sciences, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Psychology Bldg. Room 320, Orlando, FL, 32816-2385, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5288-2111
Jeffrey E CassisiDepartment of Psychology, College of Sciences, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Psychology Bldg. Room 320, Orlando, FL, 32816-2385, USA. jeffrey.cassisi@ucf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2288-5690
Robert D DvorakDepartment of Psychology, College of Sciences, University of Central Florida, 4111 Pictor Lane, Psychology Bldg. Room 320, Orlando, FL, 32816-2385, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0613-1277
Veronica DeckerDepartment of Nursing Systems, College of Nursing, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8509-3362
Stacie BeckerEmpower Tattoo, Longwood, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies indicate that physical appearance changes affect a significant proportion of breast cancer survivors, often leading to post-surgical distress. Both reconstructive surgery and medical tattoos are associated with patient-reported satisfaction, yet further research is necessary to understand their combined impact on aesthetic outcomes from the patient perspective. This study examined how breast cancer survivors evaluated the cosmetic and decision satisfaction of other patients who made various cosmetic intervention choices post-mastectomy.

methodsBreast cancer survivor support networks (n = 180) across 20 states agreed to share information about the online survey to their members. Participants (n = 251) rated the cosmetic outcome and decision satisfaction of images depicting other patients who had received mastectomy with three types of intervention: reconstruction alone, medical tattooing alone (flat closure), and reconstruction and medical tattooing combined.

resultsA factorial MANOVA produced significant within-subjects effects indicating participants consistently rated images of patients with a combination of reconstruction and medical tattooing highest in cosmetic quality, lowest in scar visibility, and highest in treatment decision satisfaction.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that medical tattooing serves as a valuable complementary cosmetic intervention, with many survivors expressing interest and recognizing potential benefits once informed about the option. However, the study's limitations, such as the need for a more diverse range of patient images for evaluation, should be acknowledged. Future research should address these gaps by incorporating photographs of patients across varying demographics, including age, body weight, disease severity, and surgical procedures, to minimize bias. Despite these limitations, this study highlights the significant role that medical tattooing can play in enhancing aesthetic outcomes after surgery, particularly from a patient-centered perspective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://link.springer.com/journal/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsMammaplastyMastectomyPatient SatisfactionTattooingAdultAgedBody ImageEstheticsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesCosmetic outcomesMastectomyMedical tattooingReconstructionScarringTreatment decision satisfaction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.