ArticleClinical oral investigations2024
The effect of various denture cleansers on the physical and mechanical properties of CAD/CAM and heat-polymerized denture base materials: an in vitro study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative evaluation of the flexural strength and surface hardness of CAD/CAM fabricated and conventional denture bases.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta analysis of mechanical properties of 3D printed denture bases compared to milled and conventional materials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Salivary pH influence on mechanical and surface properties of high-impact acrylic denture resin.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the effects of denture cleansers on the various properties of CAD/CAM and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo different brands of heat-polymerized and two of milled PMMA were fabricated (n = 50), in total 200. Each group was randomly divided into five subgroups (n = 10): control groups (D1) kept in distilled water, cleaning tablets (D2, D3), neutral (D4) and acidic electrolyzed acid water (EAW) (D5). Surface roughness, hardness and flexural strength values were evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test for comparison (p<0.05).
resultsThe milled group showed significantly lower surface roughness, greater surface hardness, and higher flexural strength values than heat polymerized denture bases (p<0.05). The denture cleansers had no significant effect on the surface roughness values of the milled specimens (p>0.05), whereas the specimens in the heat-polymerized groups and treated with D5 showed greater surface roughness values compared with the other cleaning agents (p > 0.05). The denture cleansers had no significant effect on surface hardness and flexural strength of heat polymerize groups (p > 0.05). However, D2, D3 and D5 cleaning agent decreased the hardness values of the milled group (p<0.05) and D5 cleaning agent decreased the flexural strength of the milled group (p<0.05).
conclusionsIt was observed that the applied denture cleansers affected the surface roughness, surface hardness, and flexural strength values of both denture bases but within a clinically acceptable value. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CAD/CAM denture bases showed significantly higher physical and mechanical properties than to heat-polymerized base materials. Although the applied neutral EAW cleaners give desired results for denture bases, clinical studies are needed for biological compatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39500776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.