Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500705›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2024

Identifying WHO global priority endemic pathogens for vaccine research and development (R&D) using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): an objective of the Immunization Agenda 2030.

Mateusz Hasso-Agopsowicz, Angela Hwang, Maria-Graciela Hollm-Delgado, Isis Umbelino-Walker, Ruth A Karron, Raman Rao, Kwaku Poku Asante, Meru Sheel, Erin Sparrow, Birgitte Giersing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Development of a NovelVaccines · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. T cells in Group AFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mateusz Hasso-AgopsowiczWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: hassoagopsowiczm@who.int.
Angela HwangBridges to Development, Geneva, Switzerland; Angela Hwang Consulting, Albany, CA, USA.
Maria-Graciela Hollm-DelgadoWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Isis Umbelino-WalkerBridges to Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ruth A KarronDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Raman RaoHilleman Laboratories, Singapore.
Kwaku Poku AsanteKintampo Health Research Centre, Ghana Health Service, Kintampo North Municipality, Ghana.
Meru SheelSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Erin SparrowWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Birgitte GiersingWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-005318World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, global priorities for new vaccine R&D have not been systematically identified for endemic pathogens. As part of Immunisation Agenda 2030 (IA2030), we have systematically identified priority endemic pathogens for new vaccine R&D based on country and regional stakeholder values to address this need.

methodsMCDA surveys targeting policy makers and immunisation stakeholders in each World Health Organization (WHO) region were used to weight eight criteria for prioritisation. Applying those weights to regional pathogen data yielded regional top ten pathogen lists, which are intended to inform regional deliberations on R&D priorities. The regional top ten lists were combined into an IA2030 global priority list. To inform R&D, use cases for new vaccines and monoclonal antibodies were identified, then categorized in terms of the activities needed to accelerate progress.

findingsIn five out of six WHO regions, Annual deaths in children under five and Contribution to antimicrobial resistance were the most heavily weighted criteria. How participants weighted the criteria was not associated with their region, biographical characteristics, or areas of expertise. Five pathogens were common priorities across all regions: M tuberculosis, HIV-1, K pneumoniae, S aureus, and Extra-intestinal pathogenic E coli. Six pathogens were priorities in single regions. Combining regional top ten lists provided a global list of 17 priority pathogens for new vaccine R&D. Thirty-four distinct use cases were identified for new products targeting these pathogens. While most are in the "Advance product development" category, ten are in the "Research" category and seven are in the "Prepare to implement" category.

interpretationThese priorities for new vaccine R&D will help stakeholders better respond to regional and country needs. The use cases will inform R&D and enable monitoring of R&D under IA2030.

fundingThe work was funded by a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant to WHO (INV-005318).

Indexed as

Vaccine DevelopmentVaccinesWorld Health OrganizationDecision Support TechniquesGlobal HealthHumansImmunizationResearchVaccinesDevelopmentIA2030PrioritiesResearchVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39500705
PMCPMC11663754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.