Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500601›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2024

The efficacy of valproate in acute mania, bipolar depression and maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder: an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses.

Jair Mari, Luiz Henrique Junqueira Dieckmann, Daniel Prates-Baldez, Michel Haddad, Naielly Rodrigues da Silva, Flavio Kapczinski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Valproate Exposure as anCNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of weight gain associated with valproic acid: a scoping review.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jair MariUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil jamari17@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5403-0112
Luiz Henrique Junqueira DieckmannBrazilian Institute of Practical Psychopharmacology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Prates-BaldezLaboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8050-9696
Michel HaddadBrazilian Institute of Practical Psychopharmacology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Naielly Rodrigues da SilvaBrazilian Institute of Practical Psychopharmacology, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0155-2670
Flavio KapczinskiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Hamilton, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to conduct an overview on the comparative efficacy of valproate in acute mania, bipolar depression and maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder (BD).

methodWe performed an overview of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024497749). We searched Medline and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Summary measures comparing valproate with placebo or other active drugs were described.

resultsWe included 26 systematic reviews. For acute mania (31 RCTs, n=4376), valproate showed a significantly better response than placebo in two high-quality systematic reviews (RR=1.42; 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.71) (OR=2.05; 95% CI: 1.32 to 3.20). No significant differences with lithium were found in most outcomes. Valproate had similar efficacy to quetiapine and lower efficacy compared with risperidone, with conflicting results when compared with olanzapine. In bipolar depression (7 RCTs, n=399), valproate was more effective than placebo in reducing depressive symptoms (OR=2.80; 95% CI: 1.26 to 6.18) and achieving remission (OR=2.4; 95% CI: 1.09 to 5.29) (OR=2.15; 95% CI: 0.82 to 5.6), considering the results of three high-quality systematic reviews. No significant difference was observed with lithium, lurasidone, quetiapine or olanzapine plus fluoxetine, but valproate showed superior efficacy to aripiprazole, ziprasidone and agomelatine. In maintenance treatment (11 RCTs, n=1063), valproate was superior to placebo in preventing relapse of any mood episode in two high-quality systematic reviews (RR=0.63; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.83) (RR=0.63; 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.83). No significant difference was found with lithium, olanzapine or lamotrigine.

conclusionThis overview highlights favourable results for valproate compared with placebo in all phases of BD, as well as presenting specific results in comparison with other active drugs. However, these results must be interpreted considering the methodological limitations of our study.

Indexed as

Antimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderValproic AcidAntipsychotic AgentsHumansManiaMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsValproic AcidAdult psychiatryBipolar and Related DisordersDrug TherapySystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID39500601
PMCPMC11552594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.