ArticleBJGP open2025
Mental health care and pragmatic shared decision making in general practice: an interview study.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Experiences of Seeking Specialized Mental Health Care in Norway: A Qualitative Study.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare providers in general practice are expected to deliver mental health care to patients through shared decision making (SDM). It is unclear whether they perceive their SDM to be affected by challenging circumstances in mental healthcare; for example, how waiting time for therapy plays a role.
aimTo explore how healthcare providers and patients in general practice engage in SDM, given the challenging circumstances in mental health care. DESIGN &
settingA qualitative interview study in seven Dutch general practices.
methodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs (
resultsThe participants mainly reported on SDM regarding treatment in secondary mental health care. The PNMHs explained they lack an overview of available treatments and waiting times in facilities. The PNMHs therefore instruct patients to also search for options themselves. Most patients found this approach burdensome, especially those new to mental health care. These patients were said to often express no strong treatment preferences and rely on advice by their healthcare providers. The GPs and PNMHs explained that in such cases, they often adopt a pragmatic approach and, for example, refer indecisive patients to facilities with little waiting times.
conclusionThe healthcare providers and patients in general practice report that they adapt their approach to SDM in reaction to the circumstances in mental health care. Further exploration of how SDM is implemented and shaped by challenging circumstances across different healthcare settings is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.