Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500524›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025

Postprocedural Brachial Neuritis: Clinical, Electrodiagnostic, and Neuroimaging Features.

Vardhaan S Ambati, Neha Madugala, Noriko Anderson, Ann N Poncelet, Bradley R Bedell, Reshma P Kolala, Praveen V Mummaneni, Vinil N Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vardhaan S AmbatiFrom the School of Medicine (V.S.A.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-0074-9217
Neha MadugalaDepartment of Neurology (N.M., N.A., A.N.P., B.R.B., R.P.K.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0009-0000-5679-8005
Noriko AndersonDepartment of Neurology (N.M., N.A., A.N.P., B.R.B., R.P.K.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ann N PonceletDepartment of Neurology (N.M., N.A., A.N.P., B.R.B., R.P.K.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-0520-6978
Bradley R BedellDepartment of Neurology (N.M., N.A., A.N.P., B.R.B., R.P.K.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Reshma P KolalaDepartment of Neurology (N.M., N.A., A.N.P., B.R.B., R.P.K.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Praveen V MummaneniDepartment of Neurological Surgery (V.S.A., P.V.M.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Vinil N ShahDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging (V.N.S.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California Vinil.Shah@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0803-5067

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeBrachial neuritis is a monophasic condition affecting the brachial plexus and its branches, manifesting as acute shoulder and upper arm pain, followed by weakness and paresthesias. It can be triggered by antecedent events, including procedures such as surgery. Misdiagnosis and delay in diagnosis are common. Imaging is important to confirm the diagnosis of postprocedural brachial neuritis and exclude other etiologies. MATERIALS AND

methodsClinical, electrodiagnostic, and neuroimaging features of patients with postprocedural brachial neuritis from a single quaternary care institution were identified and analyzed.

resultsSix patients (2 women) were identified with a median age of 62 (range 49-70) years. Antecedent procedures included 4 cervical spine surgeries, 1 rotator cuff repair, and 1 central venous catheter placement. Time to symptom onset ranged from 1 day to 2 weeks. The initial symptom for 5 of the 6 patients was severe upper extremity pain followed by weakness. All patients had electrodiagnostic tests and MR neurography consistent with brachial neuritis. MR neurogram showed plexus and/or terminal branch abnormalities with associated muscular denervation edema. The C5 or C6 root and/or upper trunk were always involved. The most common branches affected were the suprascapular, long thoracic, and axillary nerves. Hourglass constrictions (HGCs) of these nerves were seen in 3 of 6 patients. The average time to diagnosis was 3.4 (range 1.5-5) months.

conclusionsPostprocedural brachial neuritis is an under-recognized cause of acute upper extremity pain and weakness. MR neurography can exclude iatrogenic causes and document the presence of HGCs in affected nerves. Diagnostic neuroradiologists should be aware of this clinical entity and associated neuroimaging findings.

Indexed as

Brachial Plexus NeuritisElectrodiagnosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39500524
PMCPMC12091966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.