Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500379›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Inbreeding avoidance and cost in a small, isolated trout population.

Donovan A Bell, Ryan P Kovach, Andrew R Whiteley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Donovan A BellWildlife Biology Program, W. A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6209-8723
Ryan P KovachMontana Fish, Wildlife & Parks, Missoula, MT, USA.
Andrew R WhiteleyWildlife Biology Program, W. A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-1652278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistence of small populations is influenced by the degree and cost of inbreeding, with the degree of inbreeding depending on whether close-kin mating is passively or actively avoided. Few studies have simultaneously studied these factors. We examined inbreeding in a small, isolated population of westslope cutthroat trout using extensive genetic and demographic data. Passive inbreeding avoidance was low, with predicted lifetime dispersal of approximately 36 and 74 m for females and males, respectively. Additionally, we found limited evidence for active inbreeding avoidance during reproduction. Relatives remained spatially clustered into adulthood, and observed relatedness among mate pairs was greater than expected under random mating by 0.09, suggesting that inbreeding is a concern in this population. Further, we examined sex-specific inbreeding depression throughout the life cycle and provide evidence for inbreeding depression in some fitness components, including family size, juvenile survival and reproductive success. Our results suggest that, in an at-risk trout population, limited passive and active inbreeding avoidance lead to a higher degree of inbreeding than expected under random mating. Observed inbreeding, along with evidence for fitness reduction due to inbreeding depression, could put the population at a heightened risk of decline or extirpation.

Indexed as

InbreedingTroutAnimalsFemaleInbreeding DepressionMaleReproductionSexual Behavior, Animalfragmentationinbreedinginbreeding avoidanceinbreeding depressionisolationsmall population

Identifiers

PMID39500379
PMCPMC11537757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.