ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024
Inbreeding avoidance and cost in a small, isolated trout population.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fitness Regulates Non-Native Species Recovery in a Simulated Trojan MEvolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Genomic Insights Into Inbreeding and Adaptive Divergence of Trout Populations to Inform Genetic Rescue.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Inbreeding avoidance and cost in a small, isolated trout population.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The persistence of small populations is influenced by the degree and cost of inbreeding, with the degree of inbreeding depending on whether close-kin mating is passively or actively avoided. Few studies have simultaneously studied these factors. We examined inbreeding in a small, isolated population of westslope cutthroat trout using extensive genetic and demographic data. Passive inbreeding avoidance was low, with predicted lifetime dispersal of approximately 36 and 74 m for females and males, respectively. Additionally, we found limited evidence for active inbreeding avoidance during reproduction. Relatives remained spatially clustered into adulthood, and observed relatedness among mate pairs was greater than expected under random mating by 0.09, suggesting that inbreeding is a concern in this population. Further, we examined sex-specific inbreeding depression throughout the life cycle and provide evidence for inbreeding depression in some fitness components, including family size, juvenile survival and reproductive success. Our results suggest that, in an at-risk trout population, limited passive and active inbreeding avoidance lead to a higher degree of inbreeding than expected under random mating. Observed inbreeding, along with evidence for fitness reduction due to inbreeding depression, could put the population at a heightened risk of decline or extirpation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.