ArticlePsychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie2025
[Organised abuse in the GDR - A Secondary Analysis of the Victims' Perspective].
Article in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOrganiszed abuse (OA) is a form of long-lasting, mostly sexualized violence against children, youth, or women by networked perpetrators for financial and power-related enrichment. Individual reports and historical analyses imply this violence could have taken place in the German Democratic Republic (GDR). This study is the first to shed light on OA in the GDR from the perspective of those affected.
methodsN=10 confidential hearings and written reports of victims of sexualized violence in childhood and adolescence in the GDR, which were made available by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse in Germany, were analyzed using content-structuring qualitative content analysis.
resultsOA was described with multiple forms of sexualized, physical and psychological violence. Those affected place OA in different contexts, with other categories (perpetrators, duration/frequency of violence, motives) sometimes dependent on these. The consequences for victims are both short- and long-term in nature and occur on both health (especially psychopathological) and psychosocial levels up to the present. There were no indications of further GDR-specific characteristics of OA. DISCUSSION: The reports of victims enable the perspective of "experienced knowledge", which has its limit where descriptions presuppose the knowledge of perpetrators (e. g., motives for violence, characteristics of violence structure). Possible political-ideological features of violence could not be discussed due to considering OA as an "ideology-free" phenomenon (in contrast to e. g. ritual abuse). In addition to definitional distinctions between different phenomena of violence, a multiperspective and multiprofessional approach is necessary to guarantee a historically sensitive continuation of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.