Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500325›Full record

ReviewCell chemical biology2025

Next steps for targeted protein degradation.

Mackenzie W Krone, Craig M Crews

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell chemical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Supramolecular Degraders: An Emerging Paradigm in Targeted Protein Degradation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mackenzie W KroneDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Craig M CrewsDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA; Department of Pharmacology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA. Electronic address: craig.crews@yale.edu.

Funding

Inducing Proximity: An Emerging Paradigm for New Therapeutic ModalitiesR35CA197589 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CRAIG M CREWS · 2015 to 2026
$10.7M
Developing Tumor-specific PROTACsR01CA238570 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CREWS, CRAIG M · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238570NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation (TPD) has greatly advanced as a therapeutic strategy in the past two decades, and we are on the cusp of rationally designed protein degraders reaching clinical approval. Offering pharmacological advantages relative to occupancy-driven protein inhibition, chemical methods for regulating biomolecular proximity have provided opportunities to tackle disease-related targets that were undruggable. Despite the pre-clinical success of designed degraders and existence of clinical therapies that serendipitously utilize TPD, expansion of the TPD toolbox is necessary to identify and characterize the next generation of molecular degraders. Here we highlight three areas for continued growth in the field that should be prioritized: expansion of TPD platform with greater spatiotemporal precision, increased throughput of degrader synthesis, and optimization of cooperativity in chemically induced protein complexes. The future is bright for TPD in medicine, and we expect that innovative approaches will increase therapeutic applications of proximity-induced pharmacology.

Indexed as

ProteinsProteolysisAnimalsHumansProteins

Identifiers

PMID39500325
PMCPMC13379811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.