ArticleJournal of vascular research2024
Cerebral Cortical Vasodilation via Nicotinic Receptors by Heated Tobacco Product Aerosol Extract in Rats.
Article in Journal of vascular research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiple Tobacco Product Use and Perceived Cognitive Function Among Young Adults in Kuwait: A Cross-Sectional Study.Tobacco use insights · 2026Article
- Heated Tobacco Products: Emerging Health Outcomes and Insights into Oxidative Stress and Pro-Inflammatory-Driving Mechanisms.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSmoking increases the risk of lung cancer due to a number of components of smoke. The use of novel heated tobacco products (HTPs), alternative to conventional combustion cigarettes, has increased in recent years. However, the in vivo biological effects of HTPs are poorly understood. This study aimed to clarify the acute effects of injecting aerosol extract prepared from an HTP on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in rat cortex by comparing them to the effects of injecting smoke extract prepared from conventional combustible cigarettes.
methodsIn urethane anesthetized rats, rCBF was measured using laser speckle contrast imaging simultaneously with arterial pressure.
resultsBoth cigarette smoke extract and HTP aerosol extract, at a dose equivalent to 30 μg nicotine/kg, injected intravenously, increased cortical rCBF without changing arterial pressure. The magnitude and time course of the increased rCBF response to both extracts were similar throughout the cortical area, and the rCBF increases were all abolished by dihydro-β-erythroidine, an α4β2-preferring nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonist.
conclusionIn conclusion, our study demonstrated that the effect of injecting aerosol extract prepared from an HTP, an acute increase in cortical rCBF, is mediated via activation of α4β2-like neuronal nAChRs in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.