Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39500139›Full record

ArticleESMO open2024

Clinical outcomes of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to HER2-low status☆.

A S Raghavendra, D B Zakon, Q Jin, A Strahan, M Grimm, M E Hughes, M Cherian, J Vincuilla, T Parker, P Tarantino and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

A S RaghavendraDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
D B ZakonDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Q JinDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
A StrahanThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA.
M GrimmThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA.
M E HughesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA.
M CherianThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA.
J VincuillaBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA.
T ParkerBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA.
P TarantinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
E A MittendorfBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
T A KingBreast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
V ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
D TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
S M TolaneyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
N TayobDepartment of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
N U LinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
D G StoverThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA.
C H BarcenasDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
A C Garrido-CastroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. Electronic address: ana_garrido-castro@dfci.harvard.edu.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tissue and Pathology CoreP50CA168504 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI LEIF W ELLISEN, NANCY U LIN · 2013 to 2026
$30.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA168504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on outcomes in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) is unclear. Using a large, multi-institutional cohort, we evaluated outcomes by HER2 IHC status in patients with eTNBC who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with stage I-III TNBC who received NAT and underwent surgery from January 2016 to June 2019 were identified from three databases. HER2 expression was defined as low (IHC1+ or 2+/FISH not amplified) or HER2 IHC score 0 by local testing at diagnosis. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates were compared using logistic regression adjusted for multiple factors. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsAmong 977 consecutive patients, 388 (39.7%) had HER2-low and 589 (60.3%) had HER2 IHC score 0 tumors. Median age at eTNBC diagnosis was 50.3 years (range 21.0-83.4 years). At baseline, clinical nodal positivity rate was significantly higher in HER2-low (55.0%) versus HER2 IHC score 0 tumors (46.6%) (P = 0.011); pCR rates were similar (32.0% versus 32.6%; adjusted P = 0.924). At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not vary significantly between HER2-low versus HER2 IHC score 0 among patients with pCR (adjusted P = 0.368) or residual disease (RD) after NAT (adjusted P = 0.573). Distant RFS and overall survival (OS) did not differ by HER2 category for patients with pCR [distant RFS (DRFS), adjusted P = 0.509; OS, adjusted P = 0.514] or RD (DRFS, adjusted P = 0.812; OS, P = 0.285). Discordance of tumor HER2 status was seen in 31.1% of HER2 IHC score 0 cases, with HER2 expression observed post-treatment; 34.8% of HER2-low cases showed discordance, with absent HER2 expression in RD.

conclusionsIn this large cohort of patients with eTNBC treated with NAT, HER2-low status was not associated with pCR or survival after adjusting for clinical factors. The discordance in HER2 IHC pre- and post-NAT likely reflects challenges in HER2 quantification and heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesbreast cancerearly stageHER2 lowpCRsurvivalTNBC

Identifiers

PMID39500139
PMCPMC11570474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.