Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499924›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Online Interest in Elf Bar in the United States: Google Health Trends Analysis.

Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Page D Dobbs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula *Department of Public Health, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0581-7808
Page D Dobbs *Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1913-6488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the popularity of JUUL e-cigarettes, other brands (eg, Elf Bar) may be gaining digital attention.

objectiveThis study compared Google searches for Elf Bar and JUUL from 2022 to 2023 using Google Health Trends Application Programming Interface data.

methodsUsing an infodemiology approach, we examined weekly trends in Google searches (per 10 million) for "Elf Bar" and "JUUL" at the US national and state levels from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Joinpoint regression was used to assess statistically significant trends in the search probabilities for "Elf Bar" and "JUUL" during the study period.

resultsElf Bar had less online interest than JUUL at the beginning of 2022. When the US Food and Drug Administration denied JUUL marketing authority on June 23, 2022, JUUL searches peaked at 2609.3 × 10

conclusionsIncreasing trends in Google searches for Elf Bar indicate that there was a growing online interest in this brand in the United States in 2022.

Indexed as

Search EngineElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHumansInternetMarketingUnited Statese-cigarettesElf BarGoogle Health TrendsGoogle TrendsJUULtobacco

Identifiers

PMID39499924
PMCPMC11576596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.