Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499915›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

A Deep Learning Model to Predict Breast Implant Texture Types Using Ultrasonography Images: Feasibility Development Study.

Ho Heon Kim, Won Chan Jeong, Kyungran Pi, Angela Soeun Lee, Min Soo Kim, Hye Jin Kim, Jae Hong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ho Heon KimDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Medical School of Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7260-7504
Won Chan Jeong3Billion, Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0008-1931-5957
Kyungran PiQuantic EMBA, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-8797-8256
Angela Soeun LeeKorean Society of Breast Implant Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4040-1557
Min Soo KimKorean Society of Breast Implant Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3230-6309
Hye Jin KimKorean Society of Breast Implant Research, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-5674
Jae Hong KimThe W Clinic, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7162-9944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast implants, including textured variants, have been widely used in aesthetic and reconstructive mammoplasty. However, the textured type, which is one of the shell texture types of breast implants, has been identified as a possible etiologic factor for lymphoma, specifically breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). Identifying the shell texture type of the implant is critical to diagnosing BIA-ALCL. However, distinguishing the shell texture type can be difficult due to the loss of human memory and medical history. An alternative approach is to use ultrasonography, but this method also has limitations in quantitative assessment.

objectiveThis study aims to determine the feasibility of using a deep learning model to classify the shell texture type of breast implants and make robust predictions from ultrasonography images from heterogeneous sources.

methodsA total of 19,502 breast implant images were retrospectively collected from heterogeneous sources, including images captured from both Canon and GE devices, images of ruptured implants, and images without implants, as well as publicly available images. The Canon images were trained using ResNet-50. The model's performance on the Canon dataset was evaluated using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Additionally, external validation was conducted using the GE and publicly available datasets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (PRAUC) were calculated based on the contribution of the pixels with Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM). To identify the significant pixels for classification, we masked the pixels that contributed less than 10%, up to a maximum of 100%. To assess the model's robustness to uncertainty, Shannon entropy was calculated for 4 image groups: Canon, GE, ruptured implants, and without implants.

resultsThe deep learning model achieved an average AUROC of 0.98 and a PRAUC of 0.88 in the Canon dataset. The model achieved an AUROC of 0.985 and a PRAUC of 0.748 for images captured with GE devices. Additionally, the model predicted an AUROC of 0.909 and a PRAUC of 0.958 for the publicly available dataset. This model maintained the PRAUC values for quantitative validation when masking up to 90% of the least-contributing pixels and the remnant pixels in breast shell layers. Furthermore, the prediction uncertainty increased in the following order: Canon (0.066), GE (0072), ruptured implants (0.371), and no implants (0.777).

conclusionsWe have demonstrated the feasibility of using deep learning to predict the shell texture type of breast implants. This approach quantifies the shell texture types of breast implants, supporting the first step in the diagnosis of BIA-ALCL.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsDeep LearningFeasibility StudiesBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphoma, Large-Cell, AnaplasticRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyartificial intelligencebreast implantscshell surface topographydeep learningmachine learningmammoplastyultrasonography: AI-assisted diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39499915
PMCPMC11576615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.