Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499715›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Analysis of clinicopathological factors associate with the visibility of early gastric cancer in endoscopic examination and usefulness of linked color imaging: A multicenter prospective study.

Kensuke Fukuda, Kazuhiro Mizukami, Daisuke Yamaguch, Yuichiro Tanaka, Kazutoshi Hashiguchi, Takashi Akutagawa, Ryo Shimoda, Sho Suzuki, Tadashi Miike, Yorinobu Sumida and 15 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Kensuke FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5026-5304
Kazuhiro MizukamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3148-8884
Daisuke YamaguchDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Saga, Japan.
Yuichiro TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Saga, Japan.
Kazutoshi HashiguchiInterventional Endoscopy Center, Josuikai Imamura Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Takashi AkutagawaDepartment of Endoscopic Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Ryo ShimodaDepartment of Endoscopic Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.
Sho SuzukiDivision of Endoscopy and Center for Digestive Disease, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Tadashi MiikeDivision of Endoscopy and Center for Digestive Disease, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Yorinobu SumidaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hidehito MaedaDepartment of Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Fumisato SasakiDepartment of Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan.
Ryosuke GushimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hideaki MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
Keiichi HashiguchiDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Naoyuki YamaguchiDepartment of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tetsuya OhiraDepartment of Endoscopy, Ryukyu University Hospital, Okinawa, Japan.
Tetsu KinjoDepartment of Endoscopy, Ryukyu University Hospital, Okinawa, Japan.
Ken OhnitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shunkaikai Inoue Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan.
Tomohiko MoriyamaInternational Medical Department, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kensei OhtsuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tobata Kyoritsu Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Akira AsoAso Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryo OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.
Tetsuya UeoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Oita Red Cross Hospital, Oita, Japan.
Masahide FukudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated clinicopathological factors associated with the visibility of early gastric cancer and the efficacy of linked color imaging.

methodsPatients with early gastric cancer who underwent endoscopic treatment between April 2021 and July 2022 were enrolled. All cases underwent white light imaging and linked color imaging. Three experts evaluated lesion visibility using a visual analog scale. A mean score ≥3 on white light imaging was defined as "good visibility", and <3 as "poor visibility". We extracted patient information and endoscopic and pathological data for the lesion and background mucosa, analyzed factors associated with the visibility of early gastric cancer, and compared visibility between white light imaging and linked color imaging.

resultsNinety-seven lesions were analyzed, with good visibility in 49 and poor visibility in 48. Multivariate analysis revealed small lesion size (odds ratio 1.89) and presence of endoscopic intestinal metaplasia (odds ratio 0.49) as significantly associated with the poor visibility of early gastric cancer. Mean visibility score was significantly higher for linked color imaging (P<0.001). Mean score for linked color imaging was significantly higher in the poor visibility group (P<0.001), but not significantly different in the good visibility group (P = 0.292). Mean score was significantly higher with linked color imaging in cases with endoscopic intestinal metaplasia (P = 0.0496) and lesions <20 mm in diameter (<10 mm, P = 0.002; 10-20 mm, P = 0.004).

conclusionsLesion size and endoscopic intestinal metaplasia are associated with the visibility of early gastric cancer in white light imaging. Linked color imaging improves visibility of gastric cancer with these factors.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerStomach NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overColorFemaleGastric MucosaGastroscopyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39499715
PMCPMC11537390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.