ArticlePloS one2024
Validating a cassava production spatial disaggregation model in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting the cross-continental spread of the cassava brown streak disease epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Where to refine spatial data to improve accuracy in crop disease modelling: an analytical approach with examples for cassava.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cassava is a staple in the diet of millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa, as it can grow in poor soils with limited inputs and can withstand a wide range of environmental conditions, including drought. Previous studies have shown that the distribution of rural populations is an important predictor of cassava density in sub-Saharan Africa's landscape. Our aim is to explore relationships between the distribution of cassava from the cassava production disaggregation models (CassavaMap and MapSPAM) and rural population density, looking at potential differences between countries and regions. We analysed various properties of cassava cultivations collected from surveys at 69 locations in Côte d'Ivoire and 87 locations in Uganda conducted between February and March 2018. The relationships between the proportion of surveyed land under cassava cultivation and rural population and settlement data were examined using a set of generalized additive models within each country. Information on rural settlements was aggregated around the survey locations at 2, 5 and 10 km circular buffers. The analysis of the original survey data showed no significant correlation between rural population and cassava production in both MapSPAM and CassavaMap. However, as we aggregate settlement buffers around the survey locations using CassavaMap, we find that at a large scale this model does capture large-scale variations in cassava production. Moreover, through our analyses, we discovered country-specific spatial trends linked to areas of higher cassava production. These analyses are useful for validating disaggregation models of cassava production. As the certainty that existing cassava production maps increases, analyses that rely on the disaggregation maps, such as models of disease spread, nutrient availability from cassava with respect to population in a region, etc. can be performed with increased confidence. These benefit social and natural scientists, policymakers and the population in general by ensuring that cassava production estimates are increasingly reliable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.