Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499657›Full record

ReviewThe ISME journal2024

Biotics and bacterial function: impact on gut and host health.

Anwar Kandari, Ma'en Al Odat, Fawaz Alzaid, Karen P Scott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Effects of low concentrations of fatty acids onActa biochimica Polonica · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anwar KandariDasman Diabetes Institute, Al-Soor Street, Dasman, 15462, Kuwait.
Ma'en Al OdatMedical Laboratory Science, Mutah University, Mutah, Karak 61710, Jordan.
Fawaz AlzaidDasman Diabetes Institute, Al-Soor Street, Dasman, 15462, Kuwait.
Karen P ScottGut Microbiology Group, Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-23-CE14-0088DIALKuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences Dasman Diabetes Institute RA AM-2022-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gut microbiota, the vast community of microbes inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract, plays a pivotal role in maintaining health. Bacteria are the most abundant organism, and the composition of bacterial communities is strongly influenced by diet. Gut bacteria can degrade complex dietary carbohydrates to produce bioactive compounds such as short-chain fatty acids. Such products influence health, by acting on systemic metabolism, or by virtue of anti-inflammatory or anti-carcinogenic properties. The composition of gut bacteria can be altered through overgrowth of enteropathogens (e.g. Campylobacter, Salmonella spp.), leading to dysbiosis of the gut ecosystem, with some species thriving under the altered conditions whereas others decline. Various "biotics" strategies, including prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics, contribute to re-establishing balance within the gut microbial ecosystem conferring health benefits. Prebiotics enhance growth of beneficial members of the resident microbial community and can thus prevent pathogen growth by competitive exclusion. Specific probiotics can actively inhibit the growth of pathogens, either through the production of bacteriocins or simply by reducing the gastrointestinal pH making conditions less favorable for pathogen growth. This review discusses the importance of a balanced gut ecosystem, and strategies to maintain it that contribute to human health.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomePrebioticsProbioticsDysbiosisGastrointestinal TractHumansPrebioticsenteropathogensgut bacteriagut microbiotapostbioticsprebioticsprobioticssynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID39499657
PMCPMC11631128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.