ReviewSpine deformity2025
A team approach to improve outcomes in pediatric scoliosis surgery: a review of the current literature.
Review in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designReview article.
objectiveTo review the literature on the effect of specialized pediatric spine teams on clinical outcomes.
resultsThirty-eight studies were identified in the review. There were 11 studies discussing the efficacy of the dual-surgeon strategy, 5 studies discussing the benefits of adult dedicated spine teams, 3 studies discussing the benefits of dedicated pediatric spine teams, 8 studies discussing the healthcare professional composition of multidisciplinary spine teams, and 20 studies discussing various clinical markers evaluating the efficacy of new team- or protocol-based interventions.
conclusionPediatric spinal deformity surgery is a highly invasive procedure with room for intervention to minimize surgical complications and enhance patient outcomes. The use of standardized spine teams, comprising surgeons and various healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, has proven to be an effective strategy for improving both quality and efficiency of care. Furthermore, implementing uniform protocols among these teams has led to reductions in surgical duration, hospitalization periods, and risks such as infections at the surgical site and excessive bleeding. Further studies are necessary to evaluate additional benefits that specialized pediatric spine teams can offer in terms of clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39499449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.