Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499427›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025

A quantitative needs assessment for a tele-ultrasound consult program in a tertiary care Emergency Department.

Onyinyechi F Eke, Kelechi Umoga, Christina Morone, Hamid Shokoohi, Andrew Liteplo, Jessica Haberer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Onyinyechi F EkeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. oeke@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7180-4589
Kelechi UmogaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Christina MoroneDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Hamid ShokoohiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Andrew LiteploDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Jessica HabererDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

Funding

Massachusetts General Hospital 239054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been shown to be beneficial in facilitating patient care, but its adoption is variable among emergency medicine (EM) clinicians. We identified the patterns of POCUS use and gaps in POCUS integration in a tertiary care emergency department (ED). These data provide a user-centered platform for subsequent development of a tele-ultrasound (tele-US) consultation program. We developed a 25-item needs assessment survey and used a 5-point Likert scale to assess current patterns of POCUS use and potential needs for POCUS among EM clinicians. Data were analyzed descriptively, and a chi-square analysis was used to assess for differences in POCUS use and comfort levels among clinicians. Overall, 48% (91/190) of eligible providers responded to the survey. Clinician responders included 38% (35/91) attendings (including fellows), 29% (26/91) residents, and 33% (30/91) advance practice providers (APPs). In assessing needs, 70% (58/83) of clinicians noted they would use POCUS more if they had more training. 76% (63/83) of clinicians felt comfortable with image acquisition and 68% (56/83) with image interpretation. APPs were less comfortable with POCUS image interpretation and clinical integration of POCUS findings compared to residents (χ

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentReferral and ConsultationEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMalePoint-of-Care SystemsSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineTertiary Care CentersUltrasonographyClinical integrationImage acquisitionImage interpretationPOCUS (point-of-care ultrasound)Tele-ultrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.