Observational studyEuropean radiology experimental2024
Quantitative modeling of lenticulostriate arteries on 7-T TOF-MRA for cerebral small vessel disease.
Observational study in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05902039 (MRI Study of Blood-brain Barrier Function in CADASIL), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MRI Study of Blood-brain Barrier Function in CADASIL
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parent Artery Disease-Related Stroke: What Is the Impact on Endovascular Treatment? A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe developed a framework for segmenting and modeling lenticulostriate arteries (LSAs) on 7-T time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and tested its performance on cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) patients and controls.
methodsWe prospectively included 29 CADASIL patients and 21 controls. The framework includes a small-patch convolutional neural network (SP-CNN) for fine segmentation, a random forest for modeling LSAs, and a screening model for removing wrong branches. The segmentation performance of our SP-CNN was compared to competitive networks. External validation with different resolution was performed on ten patients with aneurysms. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) between each network and manual segmentation were calculated. The modeling results of the centerlines, diameters, and lengths of LSAs were compared against manual labeling by four neurologists.
resultsThe SP-CNN achieved higher DSC (92.741 ± 2.789, mean ± standard deviation) and lower HD (0.610 ± 0.141 mm) in the segmentation of LSAs. It also outperformed competitive networks in the external validation (DSC 82.6 ± 5.5, HD 0.829 ± 0.143 mm). The framework versus manual difference was lower than the manual inter-observer difference for the vessel length of primary branches (median -0.040 mm, interquartile range -0.209 to 0.059 mm) and secondary branches (0.202 mm, 0.016-0.537 mm), as well as for the offset of centerlines of primary branches (0.071 mm, 0.065-0.078 mm) and secondary branches (0.072, 0.064-0.080 mm), with p < 0.001 for all comparisons.
conclusionOur framework for LSAs modeling/quantification demonstrated high reliability and accuracy when compared to manual labeling.
trial registrationNCT05902039 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05902039?cond=NCT05902039 ). RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The proposed automatic segmentation and modeling framework offers precise quantification of the morphological parameters of lenticulostriate arteries. This innovative technology streamlines diagnosis and research of cerebral small vessel disease, eliminating the burden of manual labeling, facilitating cohort studies and clinical diagnosis. KEY POINTS: The morphology of LSAs is important in the diagnosis of CSVD but difficult to quantify. The proposed algorithm achieved the performance equivalent to manual labeling by neurologists. Our method can provide standardized quantitative results, reducing radiologists' workload in cohort studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.