Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499310›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Perinatal outcomes in pregnancies achieved after fertility treatments with and without diet-controlled GDM.

Baraah Abu Karen, Naama Steiner, Reut Rotem, Yael Baumfeld, A Y Weintraub, Tamar Eshkoli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baraah Abu KarenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Yitzhack I. Rager Blvd 151, 8412001, Beer Sheba, Israel. Baraahqarn@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0009-4188-4707
Naama SteinerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Yitzhack I. Rager Blvd 151, 8412001, Beer Sheba, Israel.
Reut RotemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yael BaumfeldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Yitzhack I. Rager Blvd 151, 8412001, Beer Sheba, Israel.
A Y WeintraubDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Yitzhack I. Rager Blvd 151, 8412001, Beer Sheba, Israel.
Tamar EshkoliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Yitzhack I. Rager Blvd 151, 8412001, Beer Sheba, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the rates of adverse perinatal outcomes among women who conceived after fertility treatments with and without diet-controlled GDM.

methodsIn this retrospective population-based cohort study, all pregnancies of non-diabetic and diet-controlled GDM women who conceived after fertility treatments (in-vitro fertilization - IVF and ovulation induction - OI) and delivered between the years 1996-2016 in a tertiary medical center, were included. Pregnancies of women with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus, and those complicated with gestational diabetes mellitus A2, multiple pregnancies, congenital malformations and those lacking prenatal care, were excluded. Demographical, clinical, and obstetrical characteristics were recorded, and pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to control for confounders. Statistical analyses were performed using logistic regression to control for potential confounders. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsDuring the study period, 6254 deliveries met the inclusion criteria, 10.23% of them (n = 640) had diet-controlled GDM. Pregnancies with diet-controlled GDM were found to be associated with significantly higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (15.6% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.001), polyhydramnios (5.9% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001), and cesarean deliveries (40.8% vs. 31.9%, p < 0.001). Diet-controlled GDM was also found to be an independent protective factor against perinatal mortality (aOR = 0.22, 95% Cl 0.05-0.92, P = 0.04) possibly due to the more intensive monitoring and management typically provided to women undergoing fertility treatments. This close care may mitigate some of the risks associated with ART, leading to improved perinatal outcomes.

conclusionAmong pregnancies achieved after fertility treatments, diet-controlled GDM was associated with reduced perinatal mortality and higher rates of certain pregnancy complications. These findings highlight the importance of close monitoring and careful management of women with diet-controlled GDM, as it may help mitigate risks associated with ART pregnancies. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind these outcomes and to optimize management strategies for this specific population.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalFertilization in VitroPregnancy OutcomeAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsOvulation InductionPolyhydramniosPregnancyRetrospective StudiesBirth defectsFertility treatmentGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)In vitro fertilization (IVF)Ovulation induction (OI)Pregnancy complications

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.