Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499306›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2025

CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy of the prostate bed: first clinical experience and comparison to nonadaptive conventional IGRT.

J Fischer, L A Fischer, J Bensberg, N Bojko, M Bouabdallaoui, J Frohn, P Hüttenrauch, K Tegeler, D Wagner, A Wenzel and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intra-adaptational motion during online adaptive radiotherapy: analysis of couch shifts and implications for margin design.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Simulation-free radiation therapy in palliative care].Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  13. Intra-adaptational changes in online adaptive radiotherapy: from the ideal to the real dose.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

J FischerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. jann.fischer@med.uni-goettingen.de.
L A FischerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
J BensbergDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
N BojkoDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
M BouabdallaouiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
J FrohnDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
P HüttenrauchDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
K TegelerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
D WagnerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
A WenzelDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
D SchmittDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
M GuhlichDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
M LeuDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
R El ShafieDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
G StammComprehensive Cancer Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
A-F SchillingComprehensive Cancer Center, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
L H DrögeDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
S RiekenDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConventional image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of the prostate bed is challenged by the varying anatomy due to dynamic changes of surrounding organs such as the bladder and rectum. This leads to changed dose coverage of target and surrounding tissue. The novel online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) aims to improve target coverage as well as reduce dose exposure to surrounding healthy tissues by daily reoptimization of treatment plans. Here we set out to quantify the resulting changes of this adaptation for patients and treatment team.

methodsA total of 198 fractions of radiotherapy of the prostate bed (6 patients) were treated using oART with the Ethos accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA). For each fraction, volumes and several dose-volume parameters of target volumes and organs at risk were recorded for the scheduled plan (initial plan, recalculated based on daily cone beam computed tomography [CBCT]), the adapted plan, and the verification plan, which is the dose distribution of the applied plan recalculated on the closing CBCT after the adaptation process. Clinical acceptability for all plans was determined using given dose-volume parameters of target volumes. Additionally, the time needed for the adaptation process was registered and compared to the time required for the daily treatment of five conventional IGRT patients.

resultsVolumes of target and organs at risk (OAR) exhibited broad variation from day to day. The differences in dose coverage D

conclusionTarget dose coverage was significantly improved using oART. IQR decreased for target coverage as well as OAR doses indicating higher repeatability of dose delivery using oART. Differences in doses after verification CBCT for targets as well as OAR were significant compared to adapted plans but did not offset the overall dosimetric gain of oART. The median time required is three times higher for oART compared to IGRT.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAgedHumansMaleOnline SystemsOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedImage-guided radiotherapyIntensity-modulated radiotherapyOrgans at riskProstate cancerTarget coverage

Identifiers

PMID39499306
PMCPMC12283463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.