Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499300›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Spondylodiscitis of the thoraco-lumbar spine: diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT vs MRI.

Giovanni Foti, Chiara Longo, Eugenio Oliboni, Niccolò Faccioli, Lorenza Sanfilippo, Massimo Guerriero, Raffaele Augelli, Leonardo Motta, Stefania Marocco

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Spondylitis and spondylodiscitis].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giovanni FotiDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy. Giovanni.foti@sacrocuore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1426-2402
Chiara LongoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Eugenio OliboniDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Niccolò FaccioliVerona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Lorenza SanfilippoClinical Research Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Massimo GuerrieroClinical Research Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Raffaele AugelliNeuroradiology Department, University Hospital Verona, Verona, Italy.
Leonardo MottaDepartment of Infectious Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.
Stefania MaroccoDepartment of Infectious Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDual-energy computed tomography (DECT) could combine the high-resolution bone window images made available by multi-detector CT technology with its capability to identify bone marrow edema (BME) in the spine, for diagnosing spondylodiscitis. Our objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MRI and non-contrast DECT to identify spondylodiscitis of the thoraco-lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective study included 77 consecutive participants (39 males; mean age of 61) who underwent DECT and MRI (within 7 days) between January 2020 and October 2023. DECT data were post-processed on a dedicated offline workstation (SyngoVia® VB20) by using a three-material decomposition algorithm. Four radiologists, blinded to clinical data, evaluated non-contrast DECT and contrast-enhanced MRI images. The diagnosis of spondylodiscitis was based on vertebral edema, disc edema, endplate erosions, and paraspinal involvement. Diagnostic accuracy values were calculated by using biopsy as a standard of reference. A multi-reader multi-case analysis was performed.

resultsBiopsy revealed a diagnosis of spondylodiscitis in 46 patients (60%). Thoracic and lumbar spondylodiscitis were diagnosed in 37/46 (80%) and 9/46 (20%) patients, respectively. DECT and MRI overall sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.91, 0.89, and 0.90, and 0.94, 0.93, and 0.93, respectively. At lumbar and thoracic levels, the difference between AUC values between DECT and MRI was not significant (p = 0.15). For DECT and MRI, a very good inter-reader agreement was achieved (k = 0.90 and k = 0.97, respectively).

conclusionsContrast-enhanced MRI represents the most accurate imaging tool for the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis. However, only a non-significant drop in diagnostic performance was achieved by evaluating non-contrast DECT images. KEY POINTS: Question To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MRI and non-contrast DECT for identifying spondylodiscitis of the thoraco-lumbar spine. Findings MRI was not significantly superior compared to DECT in diagnosing spondylodiscitis, whereas the inter-reader agreement was near perfect for both MRI and DECT. Clinical relevance DECT represents a fast and accurate imaging tool for the demonstration of BME, erosions, and peri-vertebral inflammation in thoraco-lumbar spondylodiscitis.

Indexed as

DiscitisLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingThoracic VertebraeTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaBone marrowComputed tomographyEdemaMagnetic resonance imagingSpondylodiscitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.