ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2025
[Position paper of DGKL and DIVI on requirements for laboratory services in intensive care and emergency medicine].
Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe timely determination and evaluation of laboratory parameters in patients with acute life- or organ-threatening diseases and disease states in the emergency room or intensive care units can be essential for diagnosis, initiation of therapy, and outcome. The aim of the position paper is to define the time requirements for the provision of laboratory results in emergency and intensive care medicine. Requirements for point-of-care testing (POCT) and the (central) laboratory can be derived from the urgency.
methodsExpert groups from the DGKL (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin) and DIVI (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin) developed a classification about the urgency for the determination of laboratory parameters as well as recommendations on the necessary organizational framework and quality assurance measures using national and international guidelines, review articles, and original papers.
resultsThree levels of urgency are defined, based on the turnaround time of the most common laboratory parameters: emergency 1, with a turnaround time of no more than 15 min; emergency 2, with a turnaround time of a maximum of 60 min; urgent case, with a turnaround time within 4 h. In addition, a recommendation is made when to provide the results for the main ward rounds in the intensive care unit and the emergency department.
conclusionsThe recommendations allow the organizational and technical regulations for each hospital to be aligned with the urgency of the provision of the test results to the medical team based on the medical requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.