Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499279›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent-ferrofluid microextraction followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for the enantioselective determination of chiral agrochemicals in natural waters.

Elena Lucci, Gabriele Falcinelli, Lorenzo Antonelli, Chiara Dal Bosco, Nina Felli, Massimo Giuseppe De Cesaris, Alessandra Gentili

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena LucciDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, P.Le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele FalcinelliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, P.Le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo AntonelliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, P.Le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Chiara Dal BoscoDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, P.Le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Nina FelliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, P.Le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Massimo Giuseppe De CesarisDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, P.Le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra GentiliDepartment of Chemistry, Sapienza University, P.Le Aldo Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy. alessandra.gentili@uniroma1.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of chiral agrochemicals sold as racemic formulations raises concern for the negative impacts that inactive enantiomers can have on aquatic life and human health. The present work just focuses on the determination of ten chiral pesticides in river water samples by applying a ferrofluid-based microextraction followed by their stereoselective liquid chromatography analysis. To develop the ferrofluid, magnetite nanoparticles were prepared and coated with oleic acid and then dispersed in a hydrophobic natural deep eutectic solvent (NaDES), composed of L-menthol and thymol (1:1). The stable colloidal dispersion was characterised by scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The analyte microextraction from 5 ml river samples was performed using 50 µl of ferrofluid, while acidified acetonitrile (150 µl) was used to break down the ferrofluid and solubilise the NaDES containing the analytes. All the extracts were analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. For each analyte, the baseline separation of isomers was achieved on a Lux i-Amylose-3 column (amylose tris(3-chloro-5-methylphenylcarbamate) working in reversed-phase mode; the combination with mass spectrometry detection allows the overall separation of 24 isomers (ten chiral analytes among which eight containing a single (one) chiral centre, one with two chiral centres and the last one existing in four stereoisomeric forms, due to the presence of two regioisomers with a chiral carbon) within 37 min. The method showed very good figures of merit in terms of recoveries (77.7-97.5%), intra-day and inter-day precision (2.7-7.7% and 6.9-14.9%, respectively), limit of detection (0.01-0.35 µg/L), limit of quantitation (0.03-1.20 µg/L), linear dynamic range, and intra-day and inter-day accuracy (1.2-14.8% and 1.8-15.0%, respectively). The presented method was able to detect 14 out of 24 isomers at the preventive limit established by the Italian legislation for single pesticide (that for a chiral pesticide is the sum of all its isomers) in surface waters, set at 0.1 µg/l. Finally, the method was evaluated using AGREEprep and ComplexGAPI metrics, compared with other ferrofluid-based methods, and applied to the analysis of water samples from two Italian rivers (the Nera River and the Tiber River), providing to be sustainable and reliable for the application to real river matrices.

Indexed as

Chiral pesticidesChiral separationsEnvironmental watersFerrofluidsHPLC–MS/MSNatural deep eutectic solvents

Identifiers

PMID39499279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.