ArticleUrolithiasis2024
CT-based deep learning model for predicting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in treating ureteral stones larger than 1 cm.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Improved Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections and Urinary Stone Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo develop a deep learning (DL) model based on computed tomography (CT) images to predict the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment for patients with ureteral stones larger than 1 cm. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe enrolled 333 patients who underwent SWL treatment for ureteral stones and randomly divided them into training and test sets. A DL model was built based on CT images of ureteral stones to predict SWL outcomes. The predictive efficacy of the DL model was assessed by comparing it with traditional and radiomics models.
resultsThe DL model demonstrated significantly better predictive performance in both training and test sets compared to radiomics (training set, AUC: 0.993 vs. 0.923, P < 0.001; test set AUC: 0.982 vs. 0.846, P < 0.001) and traditional models (training set AUC: 0.993 vs. 0.75, P = 0.005; test set AUC: 0.982 vs. 0.677, P < 0.001). Decision curve analysis (DCA) also proved that the DL model brought more benefit in predicting the success of SWL treatment than other methods.
conclusionThe DL model based on CT images showed excellent ability to predict the probability of success of SWL treatment for patients with ureteral stones larger than 1 cm, providing a new auxiliary tool for clinical treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39499273What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.