Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499271›Full record

ArticleOecologia2024

Invasion alters plant and mycorrhizal communities in an alpine tussock grassland.

Darby M Moyle, Julie R Deslippe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Darby M MoyleSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand.
Julie R DeslippeSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, 6012, New Zealand. Julie.Deslippe@vuw.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-9062

Funding

Te Apārangi | The Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund MFP-VUW2002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant invasions are impacting alpine zones, altering key mutualisms that affect ecosystem functions. Plant-mycorrhizal associations are sensitive to invasion, but previous studies have been limited in the types of mycorrhizas examined. Consequently, little is known about how invaders that host rarer types of mycorrhizas may affect community and ecosystem properties. We studied invasion by an ericoid mycorrhizal host plant (Calluna vulgaris L., heather) in alpine tussock grasslands in New Zealand. We investigate the effects of increasing C. vulgaris density on the plant and soil microbial community and on mycorrhization in the dominant native species (Chionochloa rubra Z., red tussock), an arbuscular mycorrhizal host. We show that variation in plant community composition was primarily driven by invader density. High invader densities were associated with reductions in C. rubra diameter and in the cover, richness and diversity of the subordinate plant community. Belowground, we show that higher invader densities were associated with lower rates of mycorrhization in C. rubra and higher proportional abundance of the fungal lipid biomarker 18:2ω6 but had little effect on total microbial biomass, which may suggest increased ericoid mycorrhizal and fine root biomass in high C. vulgaris density stands. Our data suggest that disruption of native plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal networks may contribute to the competitive success of C. vulgaris, and that the dramatic decline of C. rubra with invasion reflects its relatively high mycorrhizal dependence. By exploring invasion of a plant with a less common mycorrhizal type, our study expands knowledge of the ecosystem consequences of biological invasions.

Indexed as

GrasslandMycorrhizaeBiomassEcosystemIntroduced SpeciesNew ZealandSoil MicrobiologyArbuscularEricoidMicrobial biomassMycorrhizal mismatchPhospholipids

Identifiers

PMID39499271
PMCPMC11599339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.