Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499217›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

A review of multimodal deep learning methods for genomic-enabled prediction in plant breeding.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Moises Chavira-Flores, Kiasmiantini, Leo Crespo-Herrera, Carolina Saint Piere, HuiHui Li, Roberto Fritsche-Neto, Khalid Al-Nowibet, Abelardo Montesinos-López, José Crossa

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Colima 28040, México.
Moises Chavira-FloresInstituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y Sistemas (IIMAS), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México 04510, México.
KiasmiantiniStatistics Study Program, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Leo Crespo-HerreraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, Texcoco, CP 52640 Edo. de México, México.
Carolina Saint PiereInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, Texcoco, CP 52640 Edo. de México, México.ORCID 0000-0003-1291-7468
HuiHui LiInstitute of Crop Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Chin Office, 12 Zhongguancun, South Street, Beijing 100081, China.
Roberto Fritsche-NetoLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Khalid Al-NowibetDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, King Saud University, Riyah 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Matematicas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, 44430, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, Texcoco, CP 52640 Edo. de México, México.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855

Funding

Accelerating Genetic Gains in Maize and Wheat for Improved LivelihoodsAgricultural Agreement Research FundBill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-003439 BMGF/FCDOFoundation for Research Levy on Agricultural ProductsResearch Council of Norway 301835USAID projects
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning methods have been applied when working to enhance the prediction accuracy of traditional statistical methods in the field of plant breeding. Although deep learning seems to be a promising approach for genomic prediction, it has proven to have some limitations, since its conventional methods fail to leverage all available information. Multimodal deep learning methods aim to improve the predictive power of their unimodal counterparts by introducing several modalities (sources) of input information. In this review, we introduce some theoretical basic concepts of multimodal deep learning and provide a list of the most widely used neural network architectures in deep learning, as well as the available strategies to fuse data from different modalities. We mention some of the available computational resources for the practical implementation of multimodal deep learning problems. We finally performed a review of applications of multimodal deep learning to genomic selection in plant breeding and other related fields. We present a meta-picture of the practical performance of multimodal deep learning methods to highlight how these tools can help address complex problems in the field of plant breeding. We discussed some relevant considerations that researchers should keep in mind when applying multimodal deep learning methods. Multimodal deep learning holds significant potential for various fields, including genomic selection. While multimodal deep learning displays enhanced prediction capabilities over unimodal deep learning and other machine learning methods, it demands more computational resources. Multimodal deep learning effectively captures intermodal interactions, especially when integrating data from different sources. To apply multimodal deep learning in genomic selection, suitable architectures and fusion strategies must be chosen. It is relevant to keep in mind that multimodal deep learning, like unimodal deep learning, is a powerful tool but should be carefully applied. Given its predictive edge over traditional methods, multimodal deep learning is valuable in addressing challenges in plant breeding and food security amid a growing global population.

Indexed as

data fusiongenomic predictionmultimodal deep learningplant breeding

Identifiers

PMID39499217
PMCPMC11631469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.