Trial reportInternational journal of cancer2025
A randomized trial of early cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving postoperative IMRT with or without serial cardiac dose constraints.
Trial report in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- A randomized trial of early cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving postoperative IMRT with or without serial cardiac dose constraints.International journal of cancer · 2025Trial
- The mechanisms and therapeutic advances of interactions between breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Cardiac Substructure Dose Reduction and Toxicity Risk Assessment: IMPT Versus IMRT for Breast Cancer.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal cardiac dose constraints in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) are unclear, although as low as possible is recommended. This trial proposes serial cardiac dose constraint to optimize cardiac safety. Postoperative BC patients eligible for anthracycline/taxanes-based chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy were randomized to cardiac safety arm with prespecified mean heart dose (MHD) (≤6 Gy), V30 (≤20%), and V10 (≤50%) constraints, or to a control arm with in-house protocol (mainly MHD ≤8 Gy). The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of newly onset cardiac events within 1-year post-RT. An exploratory analysis examined the relationship between whole heart dose metrics and those of substructures. Of 199 participants, 93 were in the cardiac safety and 106 in the control arm. The cardiac safety group showed lower MHD, V10, and V30. The 1-year cardiac event incidence was slightly lower in the cardiac safety group (19.4%) compared to controls (24.9%). The LVEF and diastolic dysfunction rates were 0% and 5.4% in the study arm, and 1.9% and 8.8% in the control arm, respectively. The LAD, LV, and RV received the highest doses for left-sided patients. For right-sided patients, RA, RCA, and RV were most irradiated. The MHD, V10, and Dmax of heart significantly correlated with all substructure doses in either laterality. Our study supports the early cardiac safety profile using IMRT in BC patients receiving cardiac-toxic systemic therapy, with serial cardiac dose constraints. Combined constraints on MHD and dose-volume parameters are representative of the cardiac substructure dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.