Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39499193›Full record

ReviewToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2025

Bioinformatic workflows for deriving transcriptomic points of departure: current status, data gaps, and research priorities.

Jason O'Brien, Constance Mitchell, Scott Auerbach, Liam Doonan, Jessica Ewald, Logan Everett, Adam Faranda, Kamin Johnson, Anthony Reardon, John Rooney and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Analytical choices drive toxicogenomic potency estimates: a systematic evaluation of transcriptomic points of departure.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Navigating complexity in modern toxicology: the role of omics in short-term in vivo studies.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jason O'BrienEcotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, ON J8X 4C6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2546-8940
Constance MitchellHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute, Washington, DC 22205, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1052-7087
Scott AuerbachPredictive Toxicology Branch, Division of Translational Toxicology, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6294-3069
Liam DoonanSyngenta International Research Centre, Berkshire RG42 6EY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2359-6436
Jessica EwaldInstitute of Parasitology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4, Canada.
Logan EverettCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9713-6099
Adam FarandaFMC Agricultural Solutions, Newark, DE 19711, United States.
Kamin JohnsonCorteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, IN 46268, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-5566
Anthony ReardonHealthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7124-1229
John RooneySyngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC 27409, United States.
Kan ShaoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health-Bloomington, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.
Robert StainforthRadiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada.
Matthew WheelerPredictive Toxicology Branch, Division of Translational Toxicology, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, United States.
Deidre Dalmas WilkInvestigative Safety, GSK, Collegeville, PA 19426, United States.
Andrew WilliamsEnvironmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada.
Carole YaukDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-3454
Eduardo CostaCorteva Agriscience, 71 Mogi Mirim, Brazil.

Funding

Emerging Systems Toxicology for the Assessment of RiskHealth and Environmental Sciences Institute's
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a pressing need to increase the efficiency and reliability of toxicological safety assessment for protecting human health and the environment. Although conventional toxicology tests rely on measuring apical changes in vertebrate models, there is increasing interest in the use of molecular information from animal and in vitro studies to inform safety assessment. One promising and pragmatic application of molecular information involves the derivation of transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs). Transcriptomic analyses provide a snapshot of global molecular changes that reflect cellular responses to stressors and progression toward disease. A tPOD identifies the dose level below which a concerted change in gene expression is not expected in a biological system in response to a chemical. A common approach to derive such a tPOD consists of modeling the dose-response behavior for each gene independently and then aggregating the gene-level data into a single tPOD. Although different implementations of this approach are possible, as discussed in this manuscript, research strongly supports the overall idea that reference doses produced using tPODs are health protective. An advantage of this approach is that tPODs can be generated in shorter term studies (e.g. days) compared with apical endpoints from conventional tests (e.g. 90-d subchronic rodent tests). Moreover, research strongly supports the idea that reference doses produced using tPODs are health protective. Given the potential application of tPODs in regulatory toxicology testing, rigorous and reproducible wet and dry laboratory methodologies for their derivation are required. This review summarizes the current state of the science regarding the study design and bioinformatics workflows for tPOD derivation. We identify standards of practice and sources of variability in tPOD generation, data gaps, and areas of uncertainty. We provide recommendations for research to address barriers and promote adoption in regulatory decision making.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene Expression ProfilingToxicity TestsToxicologyTranscriptomeAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansWorkflowbioinformaticsPODtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39499193
PMCPMC11775421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.