ArticleUrology research & practice2024
Scoring System to Personalize Management of Emphysematous Pyelonephritis.
Article in Urology research & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sepsis biomarkers: recent advances and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Genitourinary Tuberculosis and the Potential Impact of Delayed Diagnosis in Europe.Urology research & practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a life-threatening condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The prognosis of EPN is variable, and there is no single treatment that is universally effective. Materials and Methods: In this study, we developed a scoring system to predict the prognosis of EPN and to guide management. The scoring system was developed based on a retrospective analysis of 91 patients with EPN. Nineteen risk factors for emphysematous pyelonephritis were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Seven factors were found significant on analysis. The scoring system was developed by including these 7 risk factors: renal stone disease, leukocytosis, raised creatinine, EPN grade, and septic shock. The score ranged from 1 to 18, with a higher score indicating a worse prognosis. The scoring system was able to stratify patients into three risk groups: good risk, intermediate risk, and poor risk. The scoring system can be used to personalize the management of EPN. Patients in the good-risk group may be managed with conservative treatment, while patients in the intermediate-risk and poor-risk groups may require intervention, such as DJ stenting, percutaneous nephrolithotomy or nephrectomy. The scoring system is a valuable tool for predicting the prognosis of EPN and guiding management. It can help clinicians to tailor treatment to the individual patient and to improve outcomes. Conclusion: The prognostic score helps identify patients who are at high risk. This score helps in the selection of appropriate management options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.