Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498714›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2024

Comparison of three different methods for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: Endoloop, Hem-o-lok clip, and endostapler.

Sefa Ergun, Pırıltı Ozcan, Fatma Ipek Gunaydin, Egemen Ozdemir, Selen Soylu Yalıman, Yasemin Pekmezci, Engin Hatipoglu, Ahmet Bas, Osman Simsek, Salih Pekmezci

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sefa ErgunDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Pırıltı OzcanDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Fatma Ipek GunaydinDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Egemen OzdemirDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Selen Soylu YalımanDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Yasemin PekmezciDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Engin HatipogluDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Ahmet BasDepartment of Radiology Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Osman SimsekDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Salih PekmezciDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University- Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, İstanbul-Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency that causes acute abdominal pain and affects approximately 7-8% of the population during their lifetime. The closure of the appendix stump during laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the most critical steps of the surgery to prevent life-threatening complications such as postoperative fistula, peritonitis, and sepsis. The mate-rial chosen for appendix stump closure must be effective, safe, and economical. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal method for stump closure. In this study, we aimed to compare the advantages and reliability of three different methods used for appendix stump closure.

methodsAt Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty, Department of General Surgery, cases that underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis between January 2022 and April 2024 were retrospectively analyzed using the hospital's data system. The patients' demographic data, laboratory values, pathology reports, surgical notes, duration of hospital stay, duration of surgery, total hospital costs, complications related to the surgery within 30 days postoperatively, and the management of these complications were examined.

resultsThe study included a total of 150 individuals, with 83 (55.33%) males and 67 (44.67%) females. The average age of the participants was 38.45±14.48 years. In terms of the materials used for stump closure, endoloop was used in 82 (54.67%) cases, Hem-o-lok clip in 30 (20.00%) cases, and endostapler in 38 (25.33%) cases. In 144 (96%) cases, no Clavien-Dindo (CD) complications were observed, while complications occurred in six (4%) cases. These six complications included two intra-abdominal abscesses (CD Grade 3), two wound infections (CD Grade 1), one case of bleeding (CD Grade 2), and one pulmonary embolism (CD Grade 4).

conclusionThe use of endoloop, polymeric clips, and endostapler in laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and effective for appendectomy. All three methods can be successfully applied without an increase in intraoperative or postoperative complications. However, due to the higher treatment costs associated with endostapler, its use should be reserved for situations where securing the appendix stump cannot be achieved with endoloop or Hem-o-lok clip.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisLaparoscopySurgical InstrumentsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTurkeyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39498714
PMCPMC11843386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.