Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498607›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in nephrology and hypertension2025

The cardiovascular unphysiology of thrice weekly hemodialysis.

Sandipan Shringi, Ankur D Shah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandipan ShringiWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.
Ankur D ShahWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115677 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROUNDS, SHARON IRENE SMITH · 2016 to 2025
$45.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines the unphysiological nature of conventional intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and explores alternative dialysis modalities that more closely mimic natural kidney function. As cardiovascular complications remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients, understanding and addressing the limitations of IHD is crucial for improving outcomes. RECENT

findingsIHD's intermittent nature leads to significant fluctuations in metabolites, electrolytes, and fluid status, contributing to hemodynamic instability and increased cardiovascular risk. More frequent dialysis modalities, such as short daily hemodialysis and nocturnal hemodialysis have numerous benefits including reduced left ventricular hypertrophy, improved blood pressure control, and potentially decreasing mortality. Peritoneal dialysis offers a more continuous approach to treatment, which may provide cardiovascular benefits through gentler fluid removal and residual kidney function preservation. SUMMARY: Conventional thrice weekly intermittent hemodialysis offers a fundamentally unphysiologic equilibrium of uremic solutes. Alternate approaches have demonstrated cardiovascular benefits.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesRenal DialysisHemodynamicsHumansKidney Failure, ChronicPeritoneal DialysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID39498607
PMCPMC11606746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.