Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498560›Full record

ArticleProteins2025

Exploring the Dynamic Interplay of Deleterious Variants on the RAF1-RAP1A Binding in Cancer: Conformational Analysis, Binding Free Energy, and Essential Dynamics.

Abbas Khan, Syed Shujait Ali, Muhammad Ammar Zahid, Shahenda Salah Abdelsalam, Noorah Albekairi, Raed M Al-Zoubi, Mohanad Shkoor, Dong-Qing Wei, Abdelali Agouni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abbas KhanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0008-9754-9097
Syed Shujait AliCenter for Biotechnology and Microbiology, University of Swat, Swat, Pakistan.
Muhammad Ammar ZahidDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Shahenda Salah AbdelsalamDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-5546
Noorah AlbekairiCollege of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Raed M Al-ZoubiSurgical Research Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-429X
Mohanad ShkoorDepartment of Chemistry, College of Arts and Science, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-6748-3663
Dong-Qing WeiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4200-7502
Abdelali AgouniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-8363-1582

Funding

Hamad Medical Corporation MRC-01-22-414King Saud University RSPD2024R1035Qatar National Research Fund ARG01-0601-230451Qatar University QUPD-CPH-23/24-592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The RAF1-RAP1A interaction activates the MAPK/ERK pathway which is very crucial in the carcinogenesis process. This protein complex influences tumor formation, proliferation, and metastasis. Understanding aberrant interactions driven by clinical mutations is vital for targeted therapies. Hence, the current study focuses on the screening of clinically reported substitutions in the RAF1 and RAP1A genes using predictive algorithms integrated with all-atoms simulation, essential dynamics, and binding free energy methods. Survival analysis results revealed a strong association between RAF1 and RAP1A expression levels and diminished survival rates in cancer patients across different cancer types. Integrated machine learning algorithms showed that among the 134 mutations reported for these 2 proteins, only 13 and 35 were classified as deleterious mutations in RAF1 and RAP1P, respectively. Moreover, one mutation in RAF1 reported elevated levels of binding between RAF1 and RAP1P while in RAP1A, 7 mutations were reported to increase the binding affinity. The high-binding mutations, P34Q and V60F, were subjected to protein-protein coupling which confirmed the increase in the binding affinity. Wild-type and mutant RAF1-RAP1P bound complexes were subjected to molecular simulation investigation, revealing enhanced structural stability, increased compactness, and stabilized residue fluctuations of the mutant systems in contrast to the wild-type. In addition, hydrogen bonding analysis revealed a variation in the binding paradigm which further underscores the impact of these substitutions on the coupling of RAF1 and RAP1A. Principal component analysis (PCA) and free energy landscape (FEL) evaluation further determined dynamical variations in the wild-type and mutant complexes. Finally, the Gibbs free energy for each complex was estimated and found to be -71.94 ± 0.38 kcal/mol for the wild-type, -95.57 ± 0.37 kcal/mol for the V60F, and -85.76 ± 0.72 kcal/mol for P34Q complex. These findings confirm the effect of these variants on increasing the binding affinity of RAF1 to RAP1P. These mutations can therefore be targeted for cancer therapy to modulate the activity of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafrap1 GTP-Binding ProteinsAlgorithmsBinding SitesHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationShelterin ComplexThermodynamicsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-rafRaf1 protein, humanRAP1A protein, humanrap1 GTP-Binding ProteinsShelterin Complexbinding free energycancerdockingMAPKmutationsRAF1simulation

Identifiers

PMID39498560
PMCPMC11809134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.