ArticleProteins2025
Exploring the Dynamic Interplay of Deleterious Variants on the RAF1-RAP1A Binding in Cancer: Conformational Analysis, Binding Free Energy, and Essential Dynamics.
Article in Proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The RAF1-RAP1A interaction activates the MAPK/ERK pathway which is very crucial in the carcinogenesis process. This protein complex influences tumor formation, proliferation, and metastasis. Understanding aberrant interactions driven by clinical mutations is vital for targeted therapies. Hence, the current study focuses on the screening of clinically reported substitutions in the RAF1 and RAP1A genes using predictive algorithms integrated with all-atoms simulation, essential dynamics, and binding free energy methods. Survival analysis results revealed a strong association between RAF1 and RAP1A expression levels and diminished survival rates in cancer patients across different cancer types. Integrated machine learning algorithms showed that among the 134 mutations reported for these 2 proteins, only 13 and 35 were classified as deleterious mutations in RAF1 and RAP1P, respectively. Moreover, one mutation in RAF1 reported elevated levels of binding between RAF1 and RAP1P while in RAP1A, 7 mutations were reported to increase the binding affinity. The high-binding mutations, P34Q and V60F, were subjected to protein-protein coupling which confirmed the increase in the binding affinity. Wild-type and mutant RAF1-RAP1P bound complexes were subjected to molecular simulation investigation, revealing enhanced structural stability, increased compactness, and stabilized residue fluctuations of the mutant systems in contrast to the wild-type. In addition, hydrogen bonding analysis revealed a variation in the binding paradigm which further underscores the impact of these substitutions on the coupling of RAF1 and RAP1A. Principal component analysis (PCA) and free energy landscape (FEL) evaluation further determined dynamical variations in the wild-type and mutant complexes. Finally, the Gibbs free energy for each complex was estimated and found to be -71.94 ± 0.38 kcal/mol for the wild-type, -95.57 ± 0.37 kcal/mol for the V60F, and -85.76 ± 0.72 kcal/mol for P34Q complex. These findings confirm the effect of these variants on increasing the binding affinity of RAF1 to RAP1P. These mutations can therefore be targeted for cancer therapy to modulate the activity of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.