ArticleAnnals of surgery2026
Prediction of Severe Acute Pancreatitis at a Very Early Stage of the Disease Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques, Without Laboratory Data or Imaging Tests: The PANCREATIA Study.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management and Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity Using AI: A Surgical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- New-onset persistent organ failure predicts adverse outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- AI and Machine Learning for Precision Medicine in Acute Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Managing complicated pancreatitis with more knowledge and a bigger toolbox!Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate machine learning (ML) models' performance in predicting acute pancreatitis (AP) severity using early-stage variables while excluding laboratory and imaging tests.
backgroundSevere acute pancreatitis (SAP) affects ∼20% of patients with AP and is associated with high mortality rates. Accurate early prediction of SAP and in-hospital mortality is crucial for effective management. Traditional scores such as Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II and Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis are complex and require laboratory tests, while early predictive models are lacking. ML has shown promising results in predictive modeling, potentially outperforming traditional methods.
methodsWe analyzed data from a prospective database of patients with AP admitted to Vall d'Hebron Hospital from November 2015 to January 2022. Inclusion criteria were adults diagnosed with AP according to the 2012 Atlanta classification. Data included basal characteristics, current medication, and vital signs. We developed ML models to predict SAP, in-hospital mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The modeling process included 2 stages: (1) stage 0, which used basal characteristics and medication, and (2) stage 1, which included data from stage 0 and vital signs.
resultsOut of 634 cases, 594 were analysed. The stage 0 model showed an area under the curve values of 0.698 for mortality, 0.721 for ICU admission, and 0.707 for persistent organ failure. The stage 1 model improved performance with area under the curve values of 0.849 for mortality, 0.786 for ICU admission, and 0.783 for persistent organ failure. The models demonstrated comparable or superior performance to Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II and Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis scores.
conclusionsThe ML models showed good predictive capacity for SAP, ICU admission, and mortality using early-stage data without laboratory or imaging tests. This approach could revolutionize initial triage and management of patients with AP, providing a personalized prediction method based on early clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.