ArticleAnnals of medicine2024
A deep learning approach for gastroscopic manifestation recognition based on Kyoto Gastritis Score.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in small tissue biopsies: diagnostic applications, histochemical integration, and methodological challenges in surgical pathology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Review
- Transforming Gastric Biopsy Diagnostics: Integrating Omics Technologies and Artificial Intelligence.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Response to letter regarding "A deep learning approach for gastroscopic manifestation recognition based on Kyoto Gastritis Score".Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Letter to the editor regarding 'a deep learning approach for gastroscopic manifestation recognition based on Kyoto Gastritis Score'.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Recent advancement in endoscopic diagnosis for risk stratification of gastric cancer.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence technology in the precision diagnosis and treatment of gastroenterology and hepatology: Innovative applications and challenges.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in gastric diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in screening and medical imaging of precancerous gastric diseases.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- AI-powered three-categoryFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe risk of gastric cancer can be predicted by gastroscopic manifestation recognition and the Kyoto Gastritis Score. This study aims to validate the applicability of AI approaches for recognizing gastroscopic manifestations according to the definition of Kyoto Gastritis Score, with the goal of improving early gastric cancer detection and reducing gastric cancer mortality.
methodsIn this retrospective study, 29013 gastric endoscopy images were collected and carefully annotated into five categories according to the Kyoto Gastritis Score, i.e. atrophy (A), diffuse redness (DR), enlarged folds (H), intestinal metaplasia (IM), and nodularity (N). As a multi-label recognition task, we propose a deep learning approach composed of five GAM-EfficientNet models, each performing a multiple classification to quantify gastroscopic manifestations, i.e. no presentation or the severity score 0-2. This approach was compared with endoscopists of varying years of experience in terms of accuracy, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score.
resultsThe approach demonstrated good performance in identifying the five manifestations of the Kyoto Gastritis Score, with an average accuracy, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score of 78.70%, 91.92%, 80.23%, 78.70%, and 0.78, respectively. The average performance of five experienced endoscopists was 72.63%, 90.00%, 77.68%, 72.63%, and 0.73, while that of five less experienced endoscopists was 66.60%, 87.44%, 70.88%, 66.60%, and 0.66, respectively. The sample t-test indicates that the approach's average accuracy, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score for identifying the five manifestations were significantly higher than those of less experienced endoscopists, experienced endoscopists, and all endoscopists on average (
conclusionOur study demonstrates the potential of deep learning approaches on gastric manifestation recognition over junior, even senior endoscopists. Thus, the deep learning approach holds potential as an auxiliary tool, although prospective validation is still needed to assess its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.