Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498425›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Strategies to Overcome Erroneous Outcomes in Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Testing: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Sm Shafiul Alam Sajal, Dewan Zubaer Islam, Shahad Saif Khandker, Elizabeth Solórzano-Ortiz, Manal Fardoun, Md Firoz Ahmed, Mohd Raeed Jamiruddin, Nafisa Azmuda, Miral Mehta, Santosh Kumar and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Detection of ongoing asymptomaticFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sm Shafiul Alam SajalDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, BGD.
Dewan Zubaer IslamDepartment of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, BGD.
Shahad Saif KhandkerDepartment of Microbiology, Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical College, Dhaka, BGD.
Elizabeth Solórzano-OrtizDepartment of Chemical, Biological, Biomedical and Biophysical Research, Mariano Gálvez University, Guatemala City, GTM.
Manal FardounDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, LBN.
Md Firoz AhmedDepartment of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, BGD.
Mohd Raeed JamiruddinDepartment of Pharmacy, Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC) University, Dhaka, BGD.
Nafisa AzmudaDepartment of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, BGD.
Miral MehtaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND.
Santosh KumarDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, IND.
Mainul HaqueDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, MYS.
Nihad AdnanDepartment of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, BGD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test to detect SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, has been regarded as the diagnostic gold standard. However, the excessive sensitivity of RT-PCR may cause false-positive outcomes from contamination. Again, its technical complexity increases the chances of false-negatives due to pre-analytical and analytical errors. This narrative review explores the elements contributing to inaccurate results during the COVID-19 pandemic and offers strategies to minimize these errors. False-positive results may occur due to specimen contamination, non-specific primer binding, residual viral RNA, and false-negatives, which may arise from improper sampling, timing, labeling, storage, low viral loads, mutations, and faulty test kits. Proposed mitigation strategies to enhance the accuracy of RT-PCR testing include comprehensive staff training in specimen collection, optimizing the timing of tests, analyzing multiple gene targets, incorporating clinical findings, workflow automation, and implementing stringent contamination control measures. Identifying and rectifying sources of error in RT-PCR diagnosis through quality control and standardized protocols is imperative for ensuring quality patient care and effective epidemic control.

Indexed as

clinicalcontaminationcoronaviruscovid-19detectionfalse-negativefalse-positivemolecular diagnosticsrt-pcrsars-cov-2

Identifiers

PMID39498425
PMCPMC11532724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.