Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498419›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024

Apixaban versus enoxaparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in post-operative patients with gynecologic cancers at an urban academic medical center.

Victoria Diamond, Katherine Gerber, Geno Merli, Rebecca Mercier, Aaron Shafer, Norman Rosenblum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria DiamondDepartment of OBGYN, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Katherine GerberDepartment of OBGYN, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Geno MerliDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Rebecca MercierDepartment of OBGYN, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Aaron ShaferDivision of Surgery, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.
Norman RosenblumDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of OBGYN, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A recent clinical trial demonstrated that the use of apixaban was safe and equal to enoxaparin (LMWH) in post-operative gynecologic oncology patients. This study aimed to determine if these findings are applicable in a diverse patient population at a single site urban academic medical center. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent an exploratory laparotomy for confirmed or presumed gynecologic cancer from the years 2017-2023 at a single-site urban academic medical center. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with LMWH was standard practice at our institution up until January 2021 after which apixaban became standard for post-operative prophylaxis in our division. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients receiving apixaban post-operatively were compared to the population previously receiving enoxaparin. The primary outcome was a VTE event within 90 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included major and minor bleeding events. Results: Two hundred fifteen patients met inclusion criteria, of which 65 were discharged on enoxaparin and 150 were discharged on apixaban. Baseline characteristics in terms of age, race/ethnicity and BMI found no significant difference between the two groups. Rates of any VTE event within 90 days of surgery were similar for apixaban and LMWH (3.33 % vs. 4.61 %, p = 0.6). Secondary outcomes demonstrated that the rate of a major bleeding event in apixaban group was 1.31 % and LMWH group was 3.08 %, ( Conclusions: In this real world, urban setting, for women undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic cancer, apixaban as post-operative VTE prophylaxis showed no increase in VTE events and appeared safe with no increase in bleeding events compared to LMWH. This study adds to the literature demonstrating that apixaban is safe and effective for VTE prophylaxis in our gynecologic oncology patients.

Identifiers

PMID39498419
PMCPMC11532814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.