ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Can the radiomics features of intracranial aneurysms predict the prognosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of functional outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using pre-/postoperative noncontrast CT within 3 days of admission.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of nomograms for aneurysm rupture risk and prognosis in Moyamoya disease with intracranial aneurysms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study attempted to determine potential predictors among radiomics features for poor prognosis in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), develop models for prediction, and verify their predictive power. Methods: In total, 252 patients with aSAH were included in this study and categorized into favorable and poor outcome groups based on the modified Rankin Scale score 3 months after event. Radiomics features of the ruptured intracranial aneurysm extracted from computed tomography angiography images were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and 10-fold cross-validation. A radiomics score was created by selecting the optimal features. Other risk factors for a poor prognosis were screened using multivariate regression analysis. Three models (clinical, aneurysm, and clinical-aneurysm combined models) were developed. The performance of the models was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A clinical-aneurysm combined nomogram was constructed to forecast the risk of poor prognosis in patients with aSAH. Results: A total of three clinical variables and six radiomics features were shown to have a significant association with poor prognosis in patients with aSAH. In the training cohort, the clinical, aneurysm, and clinical-aneurysm combined models had areas under the ROC curves of 0.846, 0.762, and 0.893, respectively. In the testing cohort, these models had areas under the ROC curves of 0.848, 0.753, and 0.869, respectively. Conclusion: The radiomics characteristics of ruptured intracranial aneurysms are valuable to predict prognosis after aSAH. The clinical-aneurysm combined model exhibited the best among the three models. The clinical-aneurysm combined nomogram is a reliable and effective tool for predicting poor prognosis in patients with aSAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.