Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498391›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Multi-level feature fusion network for neuronal morphology classification.

Chunli Sun, Feng Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chunli SunMoE Key Laboratory of Brain-inspired Intelligent Perception and Cognition, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Feng ZhaoMoE Key Laboratory of Brain-inspired Intelligent Perception and Cognition, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal morphology can be represented using various feature representations, such as hand-crafted morphometrics and deep features. These features are complementary to each other, contributing to improving performance. However, existing classification methods only utilize a single feature representation or simply concatenate different features without fully considering their complementarity. Therefore, their performance is limited and can be further improved. In this paper, we propose a multi-level feature fusion network that fully utilizes diverse feature representations and their complementarity to effectively describe neuronal morphology and improve performance. Specifically, we devise a Multi-Level Fusion Module (MLFM) and incorporate it into each feature extraction block. It can facilitate the interaction between different features and achieve effective feature fusion at multiple levels. The MLFM comprises a channel attention-based Feature Enhancement Module (FEM) and a cross-attention-based Feature Interaction Module (FIM). The FEM is used to enhance robust morphological feature presentations, while the FIM mines and propagates complementary information across different feature presentations. In this way, our feature fusion network ultimately yields a more distinctive neuronal morphology descriptor that can effectively characterize neurons than any singular morphological representation. Experimental results show that our method effectively depicts neuronal morphology and correctly classifies 10-type neurons on the NeuronMorpho-10 dataset with an accuracy of 95.18%, outperforming other approaches. Moreover, our method performs well on the NeuronMorpho-12 and NeuronMorpho-17 datasets and possesses good generalization.

Indexed as

cross-attentionfeature fusionmulti-level fusionneuronal morphologyneuron classification

Identifiers

PMID39498391
PMCPMC11532082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.