ReviewJournal of pain research2024
Acupuncture and Moxibustion in the Treatment of Gynecological Perioperative Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comments on "Acupuncture and Moxibustion in the Treatment of Gynecological Perioperative Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Comment on "Acupuncture and Moxibustion in the Treatment of Gynecological Perioperative Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion in managing perioperative anxiety during gynecological surgery. Methods: Relevant studies published from the establishment of the databases to March 20, 2023, were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM. Literature screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two investigators. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0 was utilized to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Data analysis was carried out using Stata 15.1 software. Results: The analysis included a total of 3254 patients from twenty studies. It was found that acupuncture and moxibustion therapy resulted in a reduction of postoperative State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S) scores (mean difference [MD] = -3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-6.93 to -0.07], P = 0.046), as well as both preoperative and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale-Anxiety (VAS-anxiety) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) scores (pre-operation: SMD = -1.04, 95% CI [-1.73 to -0.35], P = 0.003; post-operation: SMD = -0.78, 95% CI [-1.21 to -0.35], P < 0.001) in comparison to the control group. Nonetheless, no significant variances were noted between the two groups with regards to preoperative and intraoperative STAI-S scores (pre-operation: MD = -3.38, 95% CI [-9.58 to 2.82], P = 0.286; intraoperative: MD = -1.09, 95% CI [-7.32 to 5.13], P = 0.730), and intraoperative VAS-anxiety and SAS scores (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI [-1.51 to 0.64], P = 0.427). Conclusion: During the perioperative period of gynecological surgery, acupuncture and moxibustion therapy show potential in alleviating anxiety in patients. It is noteworthy that the current level of evidence is limited by the small sample size. Therefore, further validation of these findings is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.