Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39498325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

A scoping review of the impact of eco-distress and coping with distress on the mental health experiences of climate scientists.

Luis Calabria, Elizabeth Marks

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luis CalabriaDepartment of Psychology, The University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth MarksDepartment of Psychology, The University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In the face of a future predicted to be one defined by an increase in the Earth's surface temperature, and the associated extreme weather events, distressing emotional responses are understandable. Climate scientists comprise a unique group, in that they are deeply and consistently faced with the current reality, and consequences of, climate change. 'Ecological distress', a term to describe climate-related emotional experiences, can include feelings of grief, anxiety, and hopelessness proportionate to the existential threat of climate change. Methods: This review sought to scope the current literature into how ecological distress is experienced by this population, factors that mitigate or exacerbate these experiences, and the coping strategies that are used. This review used Interpretive Content Analysis to code the data and employed a narrative synthesis of the findings. Results: This paper demonstrates the significant emotional impacts associated with working as a climate scientist, along with an associated set of coping strategies. Climate scientists share experiences of emotional distress, involving both intra- and interpersonal processes, highlighting how people working in this profession may be vulnerable to unique pressures and psychological burdens related to their work. Discussion: Climate scientists have an essential role to play in helping society and policy makers understand the implications of climate change and identifying the most useful responses. As such, it is integral that the psychological wellbeing of this group is understood and cared for. This review is the first step in synthesising current knowledge, in preparation for developing helpful methods and strategies for keeping our climate scientists well, motivated, and engaged.

Indexed as

climate changeclimate scientistseco-anxietyeco-distresspsychology

Identifiers

PMID39498325
PMCPMC11532191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.